Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ada County tables Calkins Creek subdivision; staff had cited lack of sewer connection as zoning concern
Summary
The Board tabled action on a seven‑lot Calkins Creek preliminary plat and rezoning request after staff concluded the requested R‑1 zoning would not comply with county code unless the site connects to urban public utilities. Planning staff asked for added conditions including pressurized irrigation and an IDWR permit before returning on Dec. 31.
Ada County commissioners on Wednesday left undecided a proposed seven‑lot subdivision at the southwest corner of Victory Road and Rustler Place, asking staff to return with revised findings and specific conditions.
Staff report and recommendation: Leon (Development Services) told the board that application 2024‑01215 ZCDASPR (Calkins Creek Subdivision) asked to rezone the 8.42‑acre site from Rural Urban Transition (RUT) to an R‑1 (estate residential) district and to approve a seven‑lot preliminary plat with a private road. "Staff did not find that it complies with the zoning ordinance map amendment," Leon said, citing an Ada County code provision that urban zoning intended for smaller lot development should be connected to urban public facilities (sewer and water). Staff recommended denial of the zoning map amendment but noted the Planning & Zoning Commission had recommended approval.
Proposal basics: The developer proposed five buildable single‑family lots (1.2–1.8 acres) plus a private road lot, with individual wells and septic service anticipated while the property remains outside city limits. City of Meridian staff commented that water mains are in the right‑of‑way and asked that dry utility lines be installed so lots can connect in the future; Meridian said sewer connection would require annexation and is currently about 1,375 feet away.
Public concerns: Neighbors who spoke at the hearing expressed worry about the cumulative effect of new wells on groundwater levels, the proximity of septic drainfields, and traffic and speeds on Victory Road. One neighbor noted older wells in the neighborhood have experienced lowered capacity or sand issues and urged caution.
Developer response: The applicant said the site has irrigation surface‑water rights and presented a nutrient‑pathogen (MP) study and septic permitting work showing Central District Health approved a septic location. The developer said city water mains are present and that the project team is prepared to install "dry‑line" water and sewer infrastructure in the road so future connections will be possible when the city allows annexation.
Board action and conditions asked: Commissioners did not vote to deny or approve. Instead they tabled the matter to the board’s open business meeting on Dec. 31, 2024, instructing staff to prepare revised findings of fact approving the project with two additional required conditions: (1) pressurized irrigation for the development and (2) an IDWR groundwater/permitting confirmation. Staff will return with drafted findings and conditions for the board’s consideration.
Why it matters: Staff’s zoning finding turned on Ada County’s urban‑facilities policy: rezoning to the R‑1 standard without sewer connections conflicted with the stated purpose of urban residential zoning in county code. Commissioners and staff discussed tradeoffs between preserving larger lots and allowing limited, staged development that installs dry utilities now for future city connections.
Next steps: The board directed staff to draft conditional findings reflecting the requested conditions and to return Dec. 31, 2024. If the board adopts the revised findings, the developer will still need to complete engineering, ACHD roadway improvements and Central District Health approvals before final plat and building permits.
