Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facility Use Policy 707 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Springfield Township SD reviews facility-use policy after late cancellation of Aquatic Club event
Summary
At a Dec. 17 property committee meeting, district staff reviewed Policy 707 (use of school facilities) after a Dec. 7 cancellation for the Springfield Aquatic Club and walked the board through permit procedures, recent usage statistics and recommended communication changes to reduce late cancellations.
Get email alerts on the Facility Use Policy 707 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a Dec. 17 meeting of the Springfield Township School District property committee, district administrators reviewed Policy 707, the district’s rules for community use of school facilities, after recent late cancellations including a Dec. 7 Springfield Aquatic Club event.
Superintendent’s staff member Dr. Yannickone opened the discussion with a description of Policy 707 and the district’s application and approval process for rental requests. "We have a policy 707 use of facilities that we follow," Dr. Yannickone said, and noted the policy was last updated Aug. 20. He added the board recognizes "the primary purpose of the school buildings, facilities and property is to provide students with an appropriate learning environment," but that the board "may make school facilities available to individuals and community groups without discrimination and in accordance with our policy, provided the use doesn't interfere with the educational program of the schools."
Operations staff member Mr. Ferrero, who represents the district operations and athletics approvals process, described how requests are routed and why short-notice cancellations sometimes occur. "At the high school any application for a high school athletic facility ... are first reviewed by the high school athletic department, and then ultimately ... they end with the final sign off for our operations department," Mr. Ferrero said. He added the district tries to alter event times rather than cancel outright: "We will often alter events rather than denying or canceling, outright."
The committee received usage data for the 2023–24 school year and for the current 2024–25 cycle. For 2023–24, the operations presentation said the district received more than 2,000 requests from its five largest user groups (Springfield Soccer Club, Springfield Aquatic Club, Spartan Boys and Girls Lacrosse, Little League Baseball and Softball), and initially approved 1,974 of those requests. The district reported it issued 135 cancellations that year; 94 of those cancellations were due to inclement weather or poor field conditions. For July 2024 through the date of the meeting, staff said the district had received 1,181 requests, approved 1,096 and canceled 31. Mr. Ferrero provided a breakdown of the recent cancellations: seven were attributed to replacement of a power pole on Springfield Way, eight to conflicting school events (for example, back-to-school night or parent-teacher conferences), three to gym refinishing, three to weather or field conditions, and the remaining ten to varied causes including tournaments and senior nights.
Committee members discussed the communication challenges that contribute to the perception of late cancellations. Mr. Ferrero and Mr. Watley, who jointly manage approvals, told the committee some dates submitted by clubs are denied at the onset of the request but the groups nevertheless communicate all submitted dates to their participants. "We have had groups reach out to us and concern, community members reach out to us about days that were never approved. They were denied at the onset of the request," Mr. Ferrero said. He said the district will work to make approvals clearer at the time of the initial permit so organizations do not publicize denied dates.
Board member Mr. Needleman, who said he attended a canceled Springfield Aquatic Club session with his child, said he got notice only from the club after the cancellation and urged community leaders to temper sharp messaging to staff. "These decisions are not being made by our director of operations and our athletic director out of any malicious intent," Needleman said.
Dr. Yannickone and operations staff also emphasized facility constraints that affect decisions: limited parking, restroom capacity for indoor events, custodial staffing, field wear on non-turf baseball fields, and the district’s extensive in-district athletic schedule. Mr. Ferrero said the district hosted 1,170 school-based athletic events in 2023–24 and 3,385 community-based programs, of which roughly 1,970 were from the five major user groups; the remainder came from approximately 1,300–1,400 other user groups. Staff described three rental classes: Class 1 (75% township residents) are not charged rental fees (only custodial/security for certain turf use), outdoor access is covered by a $150 annual access fee, Class 2 and Class 3 organizations pay higher rental rates (examples given: tennis court rental as low as $40 per court; a gymnasium full-day rental for a Class 2 organization at $690, plus custodial if required).
Committee members asked about remedies. Staff said they will better flag at the time of initial approval the dates that were denied, improve pre-permit communication with organizations, and coordinate with the township’s parks-and-recreation planning for a new community center that could relieve demand on district facilities. Dr. Yannickone said he would ask staff to present the district’s facility inventory and usage data to the township parks-and-rec director at an upcoming meeting.
No formal board action or vote on Policy 707 was taken at the meeting; committee members asked staff to return with any proposed administrative changes if one is warranted.
The meeting then moved to the middle school renovation topic.

