Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Arts And Culture Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Encinitas council declines to submit state cultural-district application now, asks staff to report on zoning and housing implications
Summary
After residents raised concerns and councilmembers asked for clearer information about state program consequences, the council voted to delay applying to the California Arts Council and directed staff to study potential zoning and affordable-housing implications before pursuing any official cultural-district designation.
The Encinitas City Council voted unanimously on June 24 not to submit an application at this time to the California Arts Council for designation as a state cultural district, and directed staff to return with an analysis of potential zoning and housing implications of any local or state cultural-district designation.
Arts staff presented background on California’s Cultural District program, which originated under Assembly Bill 189. Staff noted the program’s intent is to support local creative assets, economic development and cultural preservation. Council was told the most recent application round opened May 27 and closes Aug. 7, and that an organizational partnership is required (local government, an arts nonprofit, and a business/development association). Earlier pilot districts received a small initial designation grant and some later large allocations, staff said, but there is no guaranteed follow-up funding for newly designated districts.
Public speakers urged the council to decline participation in a state-run designation. Concerns cited by speakers included preserving local control, possible state mandates or requirements tied to the designation, and language in other legislation that could reserve up to 10% of affordable housing units for artists within or near a designated cultural district. Resident Dennis Caden read text that referenced artist-reservation language and urged the council to avoid opening a pathway to state control of local land-use decisions.
Councilmembers said they were supportive of fostering and celebrating local artists but wary of uncertain state program conditions and possible housing/zoning consequences. Several members said the available application packet and state guidance were incomplete and that the narrow application timeline did not give staff and community groups enough time to form the required partnerships and to test for local consequences. Deputy Mayor Tony Lyons requested a staff follow-up that would include development-services input and legislative review; staff agreed to consult the city’s legislative consultant and return with a comprehensive report.
The council’s motion not to apply now passed unanimously. Council directed staff to pursue additional analysis and to return with an item that clarifies whether a local cultural-district designation or a state application would affect zoning or require housing set-asides, and to propose a local-cultural-district approach that preserves local control if feasible.
Votes at a glance: motion to defer a state application and request a staff report passed unanimously.
