Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Employee Benefits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultant urges Polk schools to consider direct hospital contracts, tiered plan to cut claims costs
Summary
A benefits consultant described direct hospital contracting and cost‑plus models as tools Polk County Public Schools could use to reduce health‑care spending and steer employees toward lower‑cost providers, prompting questions from board members about provider choice and broker relationships.
Shane Wingo, a partner at Lakeland-based Baldwin Group, told the Polk County School Board during a Jan. 28 work session that the district could lower health‑care costs by negotiating directly with hospitals and using tiered incentives to steer employees to lower‑cost providers.
Wingo said direct contracting is already used by large employers and some Florida school systems and described a “cost plus” model that pays hospitals a percentage over Medicare with faster payment terms. “If you negotiate that contract, you’re saying I’m going to pay you Medicare, I’m going to add a percentage on top of that, and I’m going to pay you within 30 to 45 days,” Wingo said. He said hospitals accept lower margins for faster cash flow compared with typical carrier reimbursement timelines.
Wingo said a tiered network—where a preferred hospital has lower copays, deductibles and maximum out‑of‑pocket costs than other in‑network or out‑of‑network providers—helps steer employees to lower‑cost sites. He pointed to a model used in Greater Orlando that makes Orlando Health a tier‑1 option with lower cost sharing and excludes higher‑priced systems from preferred status.
Why it matters: Board members and staff told Wingo they want to contain district health costs while preserving employee choice. Wingo argued direct contracts or pre‑negotiated cost‑plus arrangements can reduce claim costs relative to traditional carrier discounts off inflated list charges. He said the district’s move from Florida Blue to Aetna earlier this year put Polk on a lower negotiated pricing curve for certain procedures.
Board discussion and disclosures: Board member Miss Miller asked whether Baldwin Group or its partners had financial relationships with carriers or providers; Wingo said typical broker commissions on placed business exist. Miller expressed concern that excluding a major hospital could limit employees’ access to specialized care, citing Advent as an example and noting employees’ preference to choose treating hospitals. Wingo and Superintendent Hyde said plan design is ultimately the employer’s choice and can be structured to keep some providers available while increasing cost share for higher‑cost options.
What was not decided: The board did not vote on any plan changes during the session. Wingo’s presentation was framed as information for the board to consider as it weighs future requests for proposals and possible plan designs.
Supporting details: Wingo recommended considering in‑district clinics, mobile care units and urgent‑care kiosks to lower costs and increase access without necessarily building new brick‑and‑mortar clinics. He also recommended employer communications geared to different age cohorts so workers understand the cost implications of provider choice.
Ending: Superintendent Hyde and Wingo said staff will continue to gather options and that the board would see various strategies as it moves toward any future procurement or plan design decision.
