Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the It Procurement 11.11 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
$20M device procurement pulled after vendors, commissioners raise concerns about deployment vendor advantage
Summary
After public comments from local vendors who said the district’s deployment vendor gained an unfair advantage, the board voted to postpone indefinitely a proposed $20 million device procurement (agenda item 11.11).
A large IT procurement item (agenda 11.11), described during public comment and on the agenda as a multi‑million‑dollar device purchase, was postponed indefinitely by the Memphis Shelby County Schools Board of Education on Dec. 3 after multiple local vendors raised concerns about fairness in the bidding process.
Local vendors and contractors used public comment to tell the board they believe a company that served as the district’s deployment vendor has an unfair competitive advantage when the district awards both deployment and supply contracts. Rocky Jackson told the board that “being the deployment vendor ... they have all knowledge of how many devices for each different category get ordered” over multi‑year deployments, and that knowledge allows the deployment contractor to secure lower distributor pricing. Daryl Thomas and Jacob Terzoli, local technology providers, similarly urged caution and raised concerns about local economic impact.
Following the public comments and board discussion, Commissioner Murphy moved to postpone the device procurement indefinitely. The motion to postpone passed by a roll‑call tally recorded as five votes in the affirmative, three in the negative and one absent. Board staff and the superintendent cautioned that postponing the item could delay device deliveries and noted the district has upcoming testing and technology needs, but several commissioners said they wanted more time to review procurement fairness and local preference policies.
General counsel and procurement staff explained that federal funding rules can limit local‑preference points on bids using federal dollars and that some solicitations (invitations for bid for goods) are governed by law to accept the lowest responsive offer rather than allow local preference. Procurement staff said the district’s Office of Economic Opportunity sets goals for local participation on certain RFPs but that federal‑funded purchases are constrained by federal rules.
Superintendent Fagan placed on the record that postponing the procurement could affect device availability for students and testing, and urged timely follow‑up.
