Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Commission Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: Cole County Commission approves juvenile bed MOU, tax‑credit extension, holiday payout and sole‑source ad

2172197 · January 1, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Cole County commissioners approved four procedural items by voice vote during the Dec. 3 budget hearing: renewal of a juvenile bed MOU with Boone County, a request to extend MDFB tax credits for a soccer complex project, a holiday‑time payout for youth specialists, and authorization to run a sole‑source ad for court steno machines.

The Cole County Commission approved four routine but consequential items during its Dec. 3 budget meeting. Each passed by voice vote; the meeting record shows all present commissioners voted “aye.”

What passed

1) Renewal of memorandum of understanding with Boone County for juvenile detention beds (2025) What the commission approved: A one‑year renewal of the memorandum of understanding with Boone County to provide juvenile detention beds if Cole County’s juvenile facility is full. The agreement retains a daily rate of $68 per bed day. County staff said the rate is used only when the county’s detention facility lacks capacity; the county’s budget includes about $5,000 in contracted bed days for the year. How it passed: Motion made and seconded; approved by voice vote. Provenance: Discussion and the motion appear in the budget packet and the transcript where staff introduced the contract renewal and commissioners moved to sign the MOU.

2) Letter requesting a 12‑month extension of Missouri Development Finance Board (MDFB) contribution tax credits for the United Capital City sports complex What the commission approved: The county signed a letter asking the MDFB to extend by 12 months a $1,000,000 contribution tax credit (intended to support a $2,000,000 private fundraising match) tied to the United Capital City (UCC) soccer complex project. County staff explained the extension was requested because land transfer and TIF approvals are not yet complete and private fundraising remains on hold until the TIF plan is finalized. The current MDFB deadline in the record is Dec. 31, 2024; the requested extension would extend eligibility through Dec. 31, 2025. How it passed: Motion made and seconded; approved by voice vote. Provenance: County staff presented project status, timing issues (TIF schedule and land donation) and asked the commission to sign an extension letter; commissioners moved and approved the request.

3) Payout of accumulated holiday time for Bringer/Prager Family Center youth specialists (2024) What the commission approved: The county approved a one‑time payout to cover accumulated holiday leave for youth specialists at the Bringer/Prager Family Center. County staff said the payout reflects staffing shortages that prevented the employees from taking leave; the estimated payout discussed in the meeting was $8,388.98, with transfers between budget lines proposed to cover the payment. How it passed: Motion made and seconded; approved by voice vote. Provenance: Staff presentation on leave accruals and a motion to authorize the payout are in the transcript and budget documents.

4) Approval to run a sole‑source public notice for stenograph/steno equipment for court reporters (circuit clerk/courts) What the commission approved: The commission authorized county staff to run a sole‑source advertisement for replacement steno machines and associated software for the circuit court reporters. Circuit staff explained the vendor is the only compatible supplier given current court reporting software licenses and the need to maintain compatibility across reporters and judges’ systems; an estimated cost discussed was about $15,000 for the initial ad and larger replacement costs later in the procurement cycle. The circuit court said alternatives would require replacing software and retraining staff. How it passed: Motion made and seconded; approved by voice vote. Provenance: Circuit clerk and judge staff described the equipment compatibility issue and asked for sole‑source approval; the commission voted to allow the ad to run.

Notes and next steps: The four approvals were procedural (contract renewals, budget transfers and procurement notices) rather than final appropriations of major capital funding. Staff said larger budget adjustments and project funding will be considered in final budget hearings in January.