Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Public hearing continued after debate over well house and porch repairs at 18 Dame Street

January 25, 2025 | Rhinebeck, Dutchess County, New York



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Every Government Meeting

Get lifetime access to government meeting videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Public hearing continued after debate over well house and porch repairs at 18 Dame Street
The Town of Rhinebeck Planning Board continued the public hearing on an application for 18 Dame Street after a lengthy discussion about a small well house on the property and the scope of porch repairs and stonework proposed by the owner.

Sean Kemp, representing the property owner Simon Sasseberg, described the application as an update to reflect bluestone work already placed on the rear portion of the property, replacement of worn front steps with bluestone, installation of a mini-split heat pump, and a request to remove a non-original well house. Mr. Kemp said the owner intends to stabilize or cap the well as needed once the well house is removed.

Historic-reviewers and board members pressed for more documentation before approving removal of the well house. Board members and commenters noted that, while an old well can be an important landscape feature, the specific structure on the property appears to be nondistinctive and in poor condition. Reviewers recommended options that would preserve the historic reference to a well (for example, a low grate or a scaled element) rather than replacing the structure with a modern replica that could mislead future viewers about authenticity. The board also discussed the need for drawings showing porch-column details, custom turned columns to match the existing appearance, and step riser heights to meet building-code requirements.

Members of the historic-review group said they expected to issue a report; the applicant agreed to wait for that input. The board continued the public hearing to Feb. 3 and requested a review memo from HayPack so members could incorporate the historic-advisory comments.

What happens next: The applicant will supply additional detail on porch-column design and stair geometry, provide documentation about the well-house condition or historic evidence if available, and the planning board will consider HayPack and building-inspector comments at the continuation on Feb. 3.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New York articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI