Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Strategic Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews strategic plan: 19 KPIs, five‑star targets and 10‑year goals guide district work
Summary
Superintendent and staff walked the board through the district’s strategic plan framework: 19 key performance indicators, a five‑star rating system and 10‑year targets. Board members requested clearer one‑page trend visuals and discussion of several KPI weights and survey measures.
Superintendent Doctor Davis presented the Oshkosh Area School District’s annual strategic plan review during a Jan. 29 workshop, outlining the district’s framework of 19 key performance indicators (KPIs), a five‑star rating system and a 10‑year goal horizon.
“Providing clarity through alignment” was the superintendent’s theme: Davis said the board’s role is to set targets while staff design strategies and 90‑day action plans to move each KPI toward long‑term five‑star goals. Davis said the five‑star targets were designed as a 10‑year north star (2033) and that the district translates those into three‑year and one‑year goals with weekly and quarterly scorecards to track progress.
Davis described the operational system that supports the strategic plan: staff strategies tied to each KPI, 90‑day action plans used by principals and executive staff, quarterly/monthly assessments for many KPIs, and weekly executive scorecards. The superintendent said the approach is intended to make the district more responsive and allow the board to monitor detailed progress in monthly workshops.
Board members asked for visual, longitudinal summaries and asked about specific KPIs and weights. Several members suggested committee review of the core area weightings and possible replacement or recalibration of the “net promoter score” used under engagement. “I think now is a good time…for us to be able to to work through some of those edits,” Davis said in response.
Board members also requested that staff produce a concise one‑page view showing historical star ratings and trends for each KPI so the board and the public can more easily track what has moved up or down year to year.
Davis said staff will return with suggested alternatives to net promoter score (for example, parent and student perception surveys), a proposal for committee discussion about KPI weightings, and the requested one‑page longitudinal summary. The board scheduled deeper dives on individual KPIs in future monthly workshops.
