Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners approve technology-policy amendment, dispatch subscription and routine appointments; no major budget votes
Summary
At the Dec. 16 meeting the Bladen County Board approved a technology-use policy amendment, a one-year subscription to an emergency dispatch mapping/notification service, multiple advisory board appointments and routine personnel matters. Several items were discussed but deferred pending further information.
The Bladen County Board of Commissioners approved several consent and routine items during its Dec. 16 meeting.
Technology‑use policy amendment: Commissioners agreed to add an item to the consent agenda to amend the county’s technology‑use policy to incorporate a referenced state citation (described in the meeting as NCG 143-83xx). The item was added to the consent list and approved by voice vote.
Dispatch subscription: The board approved a one‑year subscription to an emergency-response mapping/notification system (described in the presentation as integrating with the county’s CAD vendor and adding mapping and hazard markers). The subscription price was stated in the meeting as $8.10 (presenter noted the price would rise if not secured quickly). The item was moved, seconded and approved by voice vote.
Personnel, appointments and policy adoptions: The board approved several routine personnel and advisory‑board appointments, approved the return of a water-department staff member pending certification completion, and adopted a property‑management policy related to water-access inventory. Names for specific advisory-board appointments were moved and approved; one example recorded in the minutes was David Gooden being added to a board roster. The board also discussed but did not act on some advisory appointments that lacked candidate names.
Other business: Commissioners indicated they would not take any large financial commitments (for example, multi‑year investments) without receiving full written proposals, contract terms and legal review. Several items presented for discussion — including the Kingdom CDC housing proposal — were left for follow-up and additional documentation.
Where a mover or seconder was not identified in the public audio, the minutes recorded the voice-vote approvals without an itemized roll-call tally.
