Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Signage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kanarraville meeting clears placement of town‑limit signs, then adjourns
Summary
At a brief Kanarraville meeting, participants agreed there were no objections to placing signs marking the town limits and moved to adjourn to a January 2024 meeting date.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Signage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a Kanarraville meeting (date not specified), participants agreed there were no objections to placing county‑built signs marking the town limits and then approved an adjournment to January 2024.
An unidentified meeting participant said the county was again building signs and that county staff and a person identified as Stoney had approved the plan. "Just so you guys know, the county is back to building signs. I told them to stick it," the participant said. The participant described proposed signs reading "leaving Kanarraville city limits" and "entering Kanarraville city limits," and said the signs are intended to clarify boundaries for people buying property below town who "think that they are privy to all of the Kanarraville town water entities, everything." The participant asked if anyone objected; meeting participants indicated no objection.
After the signage discussion, the same unidentified participant moved to adjourn "to January '24 account 1 b." A second was made, and the chair called for a voice vote. The chair recorded the vote as "Aye" and the meeting was adjourned.
The record does not show a formal, recorded motion or vote specifically approving a sign installation; the transcript records a lack of objection among participants and a statement that county staff were prepared to build the signs. The transcript does not specify which county department will install the signs, the funding source for the signs, or the exact date in January 2024 for the next meeting.
Notes from the meeting: county staff involvement in sign installation was described; a person named Stoney was reported to be supportive; and the adjournment was moved, seconded and carried by voice vote.
