Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Building Safety And Enforcement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Building and Standards Commission cuts penalties for two multifamily properties, approves several demolition orders

2141615 · January 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its Jan. 22 hearing, the City of Austin Building and Standards Commission reduced previously assessed civil penalties for two repeat-offender multifamily properties, affirmed demolition or clearance orders for multiple fire- and storm-damaged properties and approved agreed orders requiring demolition within set compliance windows.

The City of Austin Building and Standards Commission on Jan. 22 reduced accrued civil penalties for two repeat-offender apartment properties and approved multiple orders requiring owners to obtain permits, complete repairs or demolish unsafe structures.

Commissioners voted to reduce penalties for Sunrise Bluffs Apartments at 1704 Nelms Drive to a combined $37,012.20 (down from $60,119.06) and to reduce penalties for Lucero Apartment Homes at 2301 Durwood/2324 Wilson to a combined $90,000 (down from $680,049.16). The commission also adopted staff recommended orders requiring demolition or demolition-ready permits at several fire- or storm-damaged single-family and commercial properties; those orders include set compliance windows and weekly civil penalties if owners do not achieve compliance.

The Nelms Drive case involved three Building and Standards Commission orders with combined assessed penalties of $60,119.06. City staff told the commission the owner had achieved compliance with the repair orders and asked the commission either to affirm the full civil penalties or to reduce them. The commission voted unanimously to reduce each of the three orders to $12,337.40, producing a total reduced amount of $37,012.20. Property counsel told the commission the owner had experienced permitting delays and COVID-era staffing constraints that slowed repairs; staff said inspectors verified that repairs were completed and classified the matters as high-complexity cases.

The Lucero Apartments matter drew the longest debate. Staff said the four orders for buildings 1–4 carried a combined penalty of $680,049.16 because building 3 and 4 had been assessed $1,000 per day per violation under an order issued in February 2024. Owner representatives said the repairs were extensive, that permits and contracting took more time than initially anticipated, and that management did not receive or did not have notice in time for an earlier commission hearing. Property representatives submitted evidence of contracts and payments and argued that the $1,000-per-day assessment for buildings 3 and 4 was excessive compared with buildings 1 and 2, which had smaller penalties.

After amendments and debate, the commission adopted staff findings and a modified order that reduced the combined penalty to $90,000 and gave the owner 60 days from the date the amended order is mailed to pay the reduced amount; if the reduced amount is not paid within that 60-day window the original combined penalty amount is reinstated and interest continues to accrue.

Other items the commission acted on included: the commission adopted a staff-recommended order for an unoccupied commercial structure at 1202 East 51st Street requiring the owner to obtain and finalize permits and correct cited violations within 45 days, with a $1,000-per-week civil penalty to accrue beginning the 46th day if compliance is not achieved. Owner representative Heather Fenske told the commission that a demolition permit had been filed and that demolition fencing and staging were in place; she said, “we are absolutely demoing these buildings.” Commissioners adopted the order 6–0.

The commission also adopted an agreed demolition order for a single-family property at 2301 Coronado Street requiring demolition within 75 days; the owner’s representative said the parties had signed the agreed order and expected to complete demolition in the near term. The commission adopted a demolition order for a fire-damaged property at 709 Delmar Avenue but modified staff’s recommended timeline: commissioners gave the owner 60 days (rather than 45) to comply, after a property representative asked for extra time because the property is subject to an ongoing partition sale in Travis County. The commission adopted a 45-day order to correct violations at a property on South Hills Circle (3413 South Hills Circle) requiring permits and repairs; staff told the commission the owner had an expired permit and should reactivate or obtain a demolition permit to clear the outstanding violations.

Commissioners emphasized that their orders are intended to obtain compliance rather than to punish, but several members said penalties must be strong enough to encourage timely action — particularly in cases involving safety hazards, exposed structural members, electrical defects or repeated code violations. The commission’s decisions were taken by recorded roll call votes on each motion; where owners asserted they were working on permits or contracts, commissioners sometimes modified the compliance window. All measures described here were adopted by 6–0 voice or roll-call votes where recorded.

The commission recessed briefly during the meeting and then continued to hear cases. One item (a hearing for a property on Lee Hill Drive) was postponed to a future meeting because no one was present to speak about it. The commission’s orders will be mailed to the owners of record and include the procedure for appeal under the Texas Local Government Code.

The Building and Standards Commission meets to review enforcement orders and adjudicate cases under the City of Austin code and the International Property Maintenance Code. Several cases at this session involved properties that had been the subject of repeated complaints and repeat-offender registration with the city.