Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administrative Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Special magistrate issues recommended denials after Ryan LLC fails to appear for multiple Hernando County hearings
Summary
Between Jan. 17 petitions 175 through 191 for parcels listed under Ryan LLC did not appear; the special magistrate confirmed appraiser values and announced recommended decisions denying relief for each no‑show petition.
On Jan. 17, 2025, the Hernando County special magistrate recorded a series of petitions (Nos. 175–191) in which the petitioner listed as Ryan LLC did not appear at scheduled hearings. For each docketed parcel the magistrate said Ryan LLC “did not state good cause and did not request that the petition be heard and evidence considered in their absence.” The Property Appraiser’s Office confirmed the assessment figures and the magistrate said recommended decisions denying relief would be issued.
The magistrate announced confirmed values and the intended recommended order for each petition; examples recorded in the hearing transcript include petition 175 (parcel key 00467006) with a just/assessed/taxable value of $252,074 and petition 176 (parcel key 00632854) with a value of $281,219. Similar confirmations were given for petitions 177–191; the magistrate repeatedly stated a recommended decision of denial of relief would be issued for each docketed parcel and that any legal rights to pursue further action in circuit court were unimpaired by the administrative recommended decision.
The magistrate’s routine announcements covered the following petitions and confirmed values (recommended decision: denial of relief in each case):
- Petition 175 (key 00467006): just/assessed/taxable $252,074 - Petition 176 (key 00632854): just/assessed/taxable $281,219 - Petition 177 (key 00641185): $302,850 - Petition 178 (key 00644164): $282,028 - Petition 179 (key 00720928): $267,091 - Petition 180 (key 00840585): $262,451 - Petition 181 (key 00841030): just $239,025; assessed/taxable $201,81 (as recorded) - Petition 182 (key 00944198): just $257,676; assessed/taxable $252,86 (as recorded) - Petition 183 (key not specified in transcript excerpt): $317,278 - Petition 184 (key 01576271): $257,203 - Petition 185 (key 01590031): just $278,26; assessed/taxable $217,913 (as recorded) - Petition 186 (key 01727233): $334,275 - Petition 187 (key 01740717): $298,042 - Petition 188 (key 01789782): $237,106 - Petition 189 (key 01789960): $265,721 - Petition 190 (key 01790137): $313,046 - Petition 191 (key 01790208): $310,165
For each of these dockets the magistrate stated the Property Appraiser’s Office values would be reflected in the recommended decisions. The announcements concluded with the magistrate noting that recommended denials would be issued and that any legal rights to pursue circuit court action were not impaired by issuance of the recommended administrative decision.
