Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Permits And Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Boise Parks and Recreation Commission approves consent items and minutes, then enters executive session on property and potential litigation
Summary
At its meeting, the Boise Parks and Recreation Commission approved a consent agenda that included beer and wine sales permits and approved November minutes before voting to enter an executive session to discuss acquiring an interest in real property and consult legal counsel about anticipated litigation under Idaho law.
Get email alerts on the Parks Permits And Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Boise Parks and Recreation Commission approved its consent agenda, including beer and wine sales permits, and approved minutes from its November meeting before voting to go into executive session to discuss a possible property acquisition and potential litigation, commissioners said during the meeting.
The commission’s chair called for a roll call and the consent agenda was moved, seconded and approved by voice vote. The consent agenda included approval of beer and wine sales permits; the meeting record does not specify individual permit holders or permit locations. Commissioners then moved, seconded and approved the minutes from the commission’s November meeting by voice vote.
Later in the meeting a commissioner made a motion to go into executive session “pursuant to Idaho code 74 dash 2061 c to acquire an interest in real property, which is not owned by a public agency and Idaho code 74 dash 206, 1 f to communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending litigation or controversies not yet being litigated, but, imminently likely to be litigated.” A second was called and a roll call was taken, with multiple commissioners voting yes; the commission then recessed into executive session. The transcript does not record further public details of what property or litigation is under discussion.
The meeting record does not provide names of who moved or seconded the motions for the consent agenda or the minutes beyond the procedural voice votes. The roll-call responses recorded in the transcript include affirmative responses from commissioners Burnham, Johnson, Walker, Raber and Baber when the commission voted to enter executive session; other roll-call confirmations earlier in the meeting indicated additional commissioners were present.
Because the discussion moved into executive session, no additional deliberations about the property or potential litigation were available in the public record provided in the transcript.

