Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Telecommunications Licensing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee reviews after-the-fact license for decorative cell pole at 100 Civic Center; staff cite federal limits on local authority
Summary
Asset Management presented a license agreement for a decorative cell pole and associated utilities at 100 Civic Center. Staff said communications providers often proceed before local permits; the city requires notifications and can seek removal if companies ignore requirements.
The committee reviewed a license agreement with New Singular PCS LLC to document a decorative wireless pole and associated underground utilities installed at 100 Civic Center (Tulsa Regional Town Addition).
Paul from Asset Management described the installation as "decorative" and said the company submitted an application and paid the city's fee after the equipment was placed. "They paid the fee. We've got obviously, there's electric conduit and cabling that runs up to this," Paul said, adding the license makes clear that the company bears costs to relocate or remove the equipment if the city requires it.
Committee members raised concerns about notification and rights-of-way obstruction. A council member asked whether companies must notify residents in advance; staff confirmed there is a notice requirement but said some communications providers do not always follow it. One council member summarized staff's account: when providers begin work without following the city's notice or permit processes, staff often pursue curative steps after the fact. Staff explained federal communications regulations constrain local actions in some cases, and the city faces a "shot clock" tied to FCC processing timelines when applications are submitted.
Members asked about design and appearance. Staff said the installed pole is intended to "fit into the texture of the landscape" and that the city has been updating standards to encourage more "attractive" installations. The committee discussed enforcement options if a provider installs equipment without applying for required permits; staff said removal and other remedies are available if the provider disregards local requirements.
Ending: The committee heard that the license documents the city's interest in the site, secures a fee and clarifies removal and maintenance obligations; staff will follow up on outstanding permitting questions and report back to the committee.
