Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Asset Sale topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public works committee hears plan to surplus 1620 East 12th Street to Tulsa Psychiatric Center
Summary
City staff told the Public Works Committee the parcel at 1620 East 12th Street, long leased to the Tulsa Psychiatric Center, would be declared surplus and offered for sale at market value; proceeds are intended for facility maintenance within Asset Management. No vote was recorded in the transcript.
The City of Tulsa Public Works Committee considered a resolution to declare the parcel at 1620 East 12th Street surplus and permit the asset management department to sell it, staff said.
Roger Acey, Asset Management, told the committee that the site “has been under lease with the Tulsa Psychiatric Center since 1959. They built their building. They renewed in 2009, for the same fee that they had before,” and that the city had been approached about a sale. Acey said the parks board reviewed the request and supported surplusing the lease area, utilities had no objections, and the city would sell “at market value.”
Committee members asked how sale proceeds would be used. Acey said the sale funds would go back into the city’s facility maintenance budget administered by Asset Management; he said this arrangement is described in the resolution backup material. He also told the committee that because the parcel is part of a larger property the city had completed a minor lot split to isolate the lease area and that adjacent long-term ground leases remain in effect to the east.
The presentation did not include a completed contract, a finalized price in formal documents, or a recorded committee vote in the transcript. During the discussion one committee member asked about the expected price; staff responded that it was “around the 380 ish” (as stated in the meeting record), which the transcript did not specify further.
Because the transcript records only the committee discussion, the sale was described as a proposed disposition requiring subsequent council action and final contracting. The committee moved on after the presentation with no final action recorded in the provided transcript.
The committee packet and staff comments identify Asset Management as the implementing department and note the parks board review; the transcript does not record a final authorization or sale contract.
Looking ahead, the item will return for any formal council vote or contract approval required by city rules. The transcript does not specify a city council agenda date or formal approval timeline.
