Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Special Education Audit topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District previewing changes after Iowa Department of Education audit of special education services

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Clear Creek Amana special education director told the school board the district is already planning teacher development, transition programming and documentation changes after a state visit that found IEP compliance and post‑secondary transition weaknesses.

Miss Winkels, director of special education services for the Clear Creek Amana Community School District, told the board on Jan. 15 that a team from the Iowa Department of Education conducted a site visit focused on post‑secondary and transition services and reviewed individualized education programs (IEPs) across the district.

The visit stemmed from two state complaints filed in 2023 and 2024. “They did mention that they did notice we have some IEP compliance issues and a lack of proper documentation, especially in our post‑secondary and transition services,” Miss Winkels said. She told trustees the district had not yet received the state’s final report but expected it in the coming days and that the department would later provide a decision about next steps and any required timelines.

Why it matters: The board heard specific student counts, staffing numbers and a timeline for corrective work that could require multi‑year follow up and direct district action. Trustees pressed for clarity about the district’s next steps and how soon changes must be implemented.

Key facts presented - Count date: Oct. 25 (fall). - Staff at count: 7 preschool teachers, 16 level‑1 teachers, 4 level‑2 teachers, 9 level‑3 teachers; 2 special education curriculum coaches; and districtwide associates (8 at the Clipper Early Childhood Academy; 60 at elementary; 15 at middle school; 15 at high school). - Student levels: 248 level‑1 students, 100 level‑2 students, 40 level‑3 students.

Miss Winkels described the district’s service continuum and how the three levels are typically supported: level‑1 students often receive minimal support or periodic pull‑out help; level‑2 students receive moderate, often pull‑out services and some associate support, and level‑3 students have the most significant needs and — at present — each level‑3 student in the district has additional adult support written into their IEPs.

Planned district response Miss Winkels said the district already has a multi‑part plan to address the issues the state identified, focused on teacher and administrator supports and changes to transition programming. Planned actions she described include: - A two‑year professional development rollout starting Feb. 19–20 focused on instruction, compliant IEP documentation and planning for embedded transition services in the high school. - Stronger principal training and district oversight for IEP fidelity; the AEA (Area Education Agency) no longer handles compliance oversight and the district must assume that role. - Expansion of work‑based learning and post‑secondary opportunities and embedding transition services in high school programming.

On the timeline and enforcement, Miss Winkels said other Iowa districts in similar situations typically receive about a two‑year window and periodic follow‑up checkpoints from the Department of Education. When asked whether the district would be surprised by further findings, she said, “I don’t feel like I’m going to be surprised. I am excited because I think it’s going to be a great time for change and new things in the district.”

Board questions and context Trustees asked whether level‑3 students always require adult support; Miss Winkels responded that the current staffing level reflects student needs now, and supports can be faded if appropriate. Trustees also pressed on staff retention for associate positions and whether the district has the operational capacity to deliver planned improvements.

Next steps Miss Winkels said the district expects the state report shortly and will act on whatever corrective measures the Department of Education prescribes. She described immediate internal steps already underway and committed to bringing updates to the board as the state finalizes its recommendations.

Ending Board members did not take formal action on the audit at the Jan. 15 meeting; the presentation served as an update and a preview of formal follow‑up once the district receives the state report.