The Missouri City Planning and Zoning Commission on Jan. 8 took several formal actions: it approved the consent agenda items listed by staff, denied a preliminary plat that staff found was not associated with a required concept plan, and forwarded a proposed amendment to Specific Use Permit No. 143 (Brazos River Park quarry) to city council with a positive recommendation and conditions.

Consent agenda: The commission voted to approve consent‑agenda items that included applications described in staff materials as a primary platform (Lakelandia) and final plans for CNS sections 80 and 86. Staff read the consent items into the record and the commission voted to approve them; no public comment was recorded on consent items.

Preliminary‑plat denial: Planning staff explained that a preliminary plat submitted for a Sienna-area parcel was disapproved because it was not associated with a required concept plan for Sienna developments and the applicant had not responded to staff requests; the commission voted to deny the preliminary plat. Staff told the commission the item had been contacted to the applicant, who had not provided documentation tying the plat to a concept plan, so the item was denied rather than withdrawn.

Other procedural items: The commission noted that a zoning map amendment item A was withdrawn by the applicant earlier in the meeting. The commission also held a public hearing and voted to forward a staff-recommended amendment to SUP No. 143 (Brazos River Park) to city council with contingencies; details for that SUP amendment are reported separately.

Votes at a glance (as recorded in the meeting):
- Consent agenda (items listed by staff: primary platform at Lakelandia; final plans for CNS sections 80 and 86): approved (motion and second recorded; roll-call votes cast).
- Preliminary plat (Sienna, not tied to concept plan): motion to deny carried (mover/second not specified in the transcript).
- SUP No. 143 amendment (Brazos River Park): motion to approve staff report and forward to city council with a positive recommendation and staff contingencies carried (see separate article for details).

Where the public was involved: No members of the public signed up to speak on the SUP amendment at the commission hearing; no public commenters signed up for the meeting’s public‑comment period.

The commission adjourned after completing its agenda.