Commission hears update on Folsom manufactured-home community; financing and down-payment barriers constrain uptake

2091402 · January 8, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Sign Up Free
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners reported that a 72-unit manufactured-home community on Folsom Street has five occupied houses to date but faces buyer-financing barriers — particularly down-payment requirements — that limit immediate uptake.

Commissioner Scott Phillips and other commissioners described progress and financing challenges for a 72-unit manufactured-home community on Folsom Street discussed at the Jan. 8 Housing Opportunities Commission meeting.

Phillips said the development has completed site work and five homes are in place; the project team has been "soft selling" homes via signage while they finalize a marketing and financing plan. The community will offer homes with prices presented in the meeting in the mid-$100,000s to mid-$180,000s depending on model and whether a garage is included; Phillips described a three-bedroom, two-bath model with a garage in the mid-$170,000s–$185,000s range. He and other commissioners said the development is attractively priced relative to typical new single-family construction but that buyer financing remains the critical barrier: lenders and programs for manufactured homes often require larger down payments and different underwriting than traditional mortgages, producing a typical down-payment requirement in the tens of thousands of dollars for buyers (Phillips described down payments in a $20,000–$40,000 range in discussion).

Commissioners and staff discussed approaches to reduce purchaser barriers, including land trusts, land-lease structures that conform with secondary-market (Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac) guidelines, and partnering with nonprofit lenders or state programs that can underwrite lower down-payment options. A staff member suggested ensuring land-lease contracts are structured to federal guidelines so loans can be pooled or sold in secondary markets; that move could lower interest rates for buyers and expand financing options. Phillips and other commissioners said they will continue to pursue land-ownership options that allow eventual lot-sale to occupants after a period (Phillips described a five-year option to buy lots at a set price), and that the group will evaluate land-trust models and potential federal or state first-time-buyer programs.

Commissioners said the units are attracting interest and that the project team will continue outreach; they invited staff to include the development as a case study at a future regional housing meeting so developers, lenders and housing advocates can learn from the financing and delivery challenges.

No formal action was taken; staff and commissioners agreed to pursue additional financing outreach and to explore land-lease and land-trust structures that could improve affordability for buyers.