This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
The Harrisonburg Planning Commission on Jan. 8 completed a series of procedural actions, electing officers and adopting internal procedures and pledges that the commission’s staff said are designed to clarify practice and improve public participation.
Elections and appointments: Commissioners nominated and elected officers by voice vote. Richard Baugh was nominated and elected chair; Brent Finnegan was nominated and elected vice chair. Commissioner Washington was nominated and approved to serve as the commission’s representative to the Board of Zoning Appeals. Anastasia Montigny was nominated and approved to serve as the commission’s secretary.
Ethics pledge: The commission adopted a pledge to use the American Planning Association’s Ethical Principles in Planning as a guide for conduct during the year. Planning staff said the pledge is drawn from the APA document included in the commission’s packet; commissioners acknowledged the pledge by voice vote.
Rules and procedures: The commission adopted updated Planning Commission rules and procedures that include a standard public‑comment time allowance of three minutes per speaker (subject to the chair’s discretion) and a practice of inviting applicants to speak before the public hearing opens and to offer a brief rebuttal after public comment. The amendments also clarify that written comments submitted in advance will be included in the record. The update was moved, seconded and approved by roll‑call vote.
Minutes and other routine business: The commission approved minutes from the Dec. 11 meeting by voice vote. Staff also presented reports, including a Rockingham County planning report and an overview of the city’s Capital Improvements Program (CIP) packet; staff asked commissioners to provide CIP comments by Jan. 29 so the full CIP can be returned to the commission in February for action.
The commission’s procedural votes were routine and carried by voice or roll call as recorded in the meeting transcript. These actions set the commission’s leadership and public‑engagement rules for the coming year but do not by themselves change city law beyond the ordinance amendment (Item 4a) that the commission separately recommended to City Council.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,141 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit