Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Drainage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wright County trustees approve small invoice, debate engineer report after DD 36 cost overrun; urgent DD 80 repair authorized
Summary
Wright County supervisors meeting as trustees for the county's drainage districts approved a $582.50 invoice for Moddam Construction and discussed major cost overruns on Drainage District (DD) 36 lateral C, while staff authorized an immediate $12,500 repair to two blowouts on DD 80.
Get email alerts on the Drainage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wright County supervisors meeting as trustees for the county's drainage districts approved a $582.50 invoice for Moddam Construction and discussed major cost overruns on Drainage District (DD) 36 lateral C, while staff authorized an immediate $12,500 repair to two blowouts on DD 80. Trustees also instructed staff to notify landowners about an informational meeting set for Jan. 13, 2025, at 9 a.m.
The board approved the Moddam Construction claim that had been presented as an invoice and signed a separate $20.1 invoice for DD 36 informational hearing notice letters. Supervisors voted to change multiple minutes that previously referenced "lateral 3" to the correct designation, "lateral C."
Why it matters: the DD 36 repair has exceeded thresholds in state drainage law that trigger additional procedures, including an engineer's report and a landowner informational meeting. Trustees debated whether to commission an engineering report after contractors' work pushed the project well above the earlier estimate, and they tabled a motion to appoint an engineer pending further review.
Most important facts
- Invoice approvals and minutes: The trustees approved a $582.50 drainage claim for Moddam Construction (presented previously as an invoice) and approved signing a $20.1 invoice for mailing informational hearing notices. Trustees also voted to correct prior minutes from "lateral 3" to "lateral C."
- DD 36 cost overrun and next steps: County staff reported total work completed on DD 36 of $83,912.50, with outstanding work expected to bring the estimated final total to $96,187.50. An October 2024 estimate for the same work had been $48,700. Because the project risk now exceeds $50,000, trustees discussed statutory requirements for an engineer's report and an informational landowner meeting; the board tabled action to appoint an engineer and directed staff to notify landowners about an informational meeting on Jan. 13, 2025 at 9 a.m. and to contact Hennigan Construction to confirm attendance.
- DD 80 emergency repair: A landowner reported two blowouts on the DD 80 main in Lincoln Township (section 29) in 24- and 22-inch tile. Staff inspected the site and said both blowouts were on the main. County staff reported receiving photos and advised that the contractor estimated repair at $12,500; staff authorized the repair to proceed immediately.
What trustees and staff said
Courtney Morris, the county's drainage administrator, presented the DD 36 invoices and site details and described the DD 80 inspection: "I went out and looked at the site. The county map on Beacon obviously does not match where the lines actually lay on the ground." Morris said photos were sent to the board and that she had asked the contractor to notify staff if the estimate exceeded $10,000; the contractor later reported a $12,500 cost, and Morris said she gave the go-ahead to repair.
A speaker identified as Cliff said he had "spoken with our drainage attorney, but did not receive a definitive answer if any engineer's report is now required with the total being greater than 50,000." Trustees discussed Iowa's drainage statutes and thresholds that require an engineer's report and a landowner meeting when project costs exceed $50,000, and a higher competitive-bid threshold (discussed in the meeting) was noted at about $153,000.
Process and unresolved items
Board members emphasized compliance with statutory thresholds. Trustees voted to table appointing an engineer pending the informational meeting and further review; they also instructed Morris to notify landowners and confirm contractor attendance at the Jan. 13 meeting. Trustees said they would revisit whether to commission an engineer after the informational meeting and after clarifying the legal implications of retroactive engineering reports for work already completed.
Context and background
- The DD 36 project had multiple prior repairs and a voluntary decision by the contractor to restructure the channel rather than a limited repair, which trustees said contributed to the cost increase.
- County staff noted that statutory thresholds have changed over time and that the requirement for an engineer's report and an informational meeting is infrequently updated; some drainage administrators said at a recent IDDA meeting that the $50,000 threshold is low but changing it requires legislative action.
What happens next
Trustees set an informational meeting for landowners on Jan. 13, 2025, at 9 a.m., and Morris was directed to send notices and confirm Hennigan Construction's availability to attend. The board tabled appointing an engineer pending the meeting and additional legal advice; trustees said they will take up formal action after landowner notification and any further information from counsel or the contractor.

