Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Zoning Pipelines topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning & Zoning budget reviewed; board hears update on hazardous‑pipeline ordinance litigation and conditional‑use workload
Summary
Planning and zoning staff presented a budget that includes funds for conditional‑use permits and consultant expenses tied to the county’s hazardous‑liquid pipeline ordinance. Staff said they have not seen court rulings affect local permit requirements and recommended modest increases in meeting, education and board‑of‑adjustment expense lines.
Planning and zoning staff presented the office’s budget and updated the board on the county’s hazardous‑liquid pipeline ordinance and related litigation.
Staff told supervisors that the pipeline ordinance contains requirements affecting the Board of Adjustment’s handling of conditional‑use permits and that litigation over similar ordinances in other Iowa counties had been appealed to the federal 8th Circuit. “I have not heard a decision or any update on that at all,” staff said of the broader circuit litigation, but recommended budgeting for continued conditional‑use activity and modest increases for meeting and training expenses.
The planning and zoning budget presented annual expenses for publications, board of adjustment meetings and contingency funds for environmental reviews. Staff noted the small volume of fee revenue from permits historically — zoning compliance permits were set at $35 and variance or planning cases at modest fees — and suggested the county could revisit fee levels if the board wished, while acknowledging that permit volume is low and fee changes would not generate significant revenue.
The board discussed education and training as part of a new or separated planning position; staff proposed a modest increase in meeting/mileage and education lines to support onboarding and conference attendance for a potential hire. For a new planning staff position staff said the current advertised salary assumption was $10,000 annually for the role and had been increased in the draft budget by 6% to $10,600 with associated FICA and IPERS costs.
Supervisors asked staff to activate an account code for board meeting mileage and to return with any recommended fee schedule changes if the board wanted to pursue raising permit charges. No formal action was taken on the ordinance itself; staff will return with revised line items and any recommended fee adjustments.
