Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Affordable Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners clear documents for 500 East Main affordable housing project; ask how 30% AMI units will be prioritized
Summary
County staff presented documents allowing the 195-unit 500 East Main affordable housing project to proceed toward HUD closing; commissioners asked for a process to ensure 30% AMI units are offered to people on the local homelessness/waitlist and clarified that the county retains ownership through a long ground lease.
Commissioners reviewed documents for the 500 East Main Street affordable housing development, a 195-unit project proposed for a county-owned parking lot adjacent to the health and human services building.
County staff said the project has HUD financing components that require approvals and that the county will use a long-term ground-lease structure similar to prior projects: the county owns the land and a 99-year ground lease will govern the developer's use. Staff said the financing structure includes 40 years of affordability requirements and that, at years 36 through 40, the county and developer review the agreement and determine next steps; the county retains ownership of the land throughout.
Commissioner questions focused on tenant eligibility for deeply affordable units. Staff said the project will include 53 units targeted at 30% of area median income and 31 units reserved for households with Section 8 vouchers; commissioners requested a clear mechanism tying those deeply affordable units to the county and city homelessness service lists and to coordinated prioritization processes so that people already on waiting lists can access those units.
County staff and the county manager said HUD deadlines require timely approvals of the project documents so closing on financing can proceed; they committed to return to the board with a framework and timeline describing how units will be prioritized and coordinated with city and county housing partners before occupancy.
No final vote on budget allocations was taken at the work session; staff noted the documents must be approved to meet HUD closing timetables and that more implementation details will be returned to the board for review.
