Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Local resident urges board to allow creationist teaching alongside evolution in science standards
Summary
A Highlands County resident urged the board to consider adding creation as an alternative to evolution in science standards and to contact state representatives; the board did not take action on the public comment.
Get email alerts on the Curriculum Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Larry Overfield, who identified himself as a Highlands County property owner and taxpayer, addressed the board during the public comment period to argue that the state science standards present evolution without including creation as an alternate explanation.
Overfield referenced the standards framework known to teachers as CPALMS and quoted a standard he identified (spoken in the meeting as "SC912L158" and similar numbering in the record) that, in his words, requires students to "describe the scientific explanation of the origin of life on Earth." He told the board that evolution and "scientific creationism" use similar evidence but asked why one is categorized as scientific and the other categorized as faith-based. "If they're both using the same things to support themselves, why is one called scientific and the other one is called faith based?" he asked.
Overfield said he had previously met with Superintendent Dr. Longshore and another district official, who he said told him the "atmosphere in our state is right for a change in our standards." He urged residents to contact state representatives to be heard on the issue.
Nut graf: The public comment raised questions about standards and classroom instruction; the board did not act on the request, and Overfield's remarks were advisory public comment only.
Board members acknowledged the comment; the superintendent thanked Overfield for speaking. No board motion or policy change was proposed during the meeting in response to the comment.
Ending: The board's public-comment period provided the forum for the concern; any change to state standards would require action at the state level, not a local board vote.

