Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Pud Reform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Grantsville council repeals PUD ordinance, directs staff to draft replacement by April 30
Summary
After extended debate, the Grantsville City Council voted to repeal the city's Planned Unit Development (PUD) code as it currently reads and instructed staff to produce new PUD/overlay language for a combined work meeting with the Planning Commission by April 30.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Pud Reform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a joint meeting of the Grantsville City Council and the Planning Commission on Jan. 30, 2025, the council voted to approve a package of land-use ordinance updates and to repeal the city's existing PUD (planned unit development) chapter, directing staff to return with replacement language for a combined work meeting on April 30.
The repeal and accompanying approvals covered amendments to multiple chapters of the Grantsville Land Use and Development Code and included a specific instruction that staff remove PUD references from use tables and related code sections, including the mixed-use zone requirement. Shelby (staff member), Jay Springer (consultant), and Tyson (city attorney) all discussed options for a moratorium versus full repeal at length before the council moved to act.
Why it mattered: Council members said the current PUD process functions effectively as a conditional use that limits the council's legislative discretion and gives applicants grounds to argue for approvals that change definitions or zoning expectations. Several speakers said that, as written, the PUD process had produced results that did not meet the city's stated objectives for mixed-use development, setbacks and access, and that the code needed to be reworked into an overlay/master development approach that preserves negotiable items for the council.
Key facts and next steps: City attorneys and staff outlined two paths: a moratorium (which can run up to 180 days and requires a written finding of a countervailing public interest) or a full repeal followed quickly by legislative replacement language. City attorney Tyson recommended repeal as the most defensible option and staff said they would present draft replacement language for an April 30 combined work meeting of the council and planning commission; if completed earlier, the draft could be presented sooner.
Tyson recommended repeal. In his words: "My recommendation is to go ahead with the repeal, as presented with directions to staff, which also counts as your messaging on that revised language to introduce a PUD process that better suits the city's needs." Jay Springer and Shelby explained that the repeal removes confusion for developers about which version of the ordinance applies and preserves the vested status of pending applications.
Vote and immediate outcome: A motion to approve the ordinances as presented and to repeal the city's PUD chapter (with direction to staff to prepare replacement language and to remove PUD references from use tables and mixed-use requirements) passed on a voice vote. The motion passed with all council members present voting in favor; the council had stated earlier in the meeting that five council members were present.
What remains open: Staff and the city attorneys will draft replacement language that may reframe a PUD as a legislative overlay or development agreement-type process that preserves negotiation authority for the council. Planning staff warned that repeal will likely prompt additional PUD-related applications from developers seeking to vest under the current code, and council members asked staff to return with a firm schedule for hearings and adoption.
Votes at a glance: The council voted to approve the package of ordinance updates and to repeal the PUD chapter; the motion carried (voice vote, all in favor, no recorded nays). The council directed staff to return with replacement language for a combined work meeting with planning commission on April 30, 2025.
Ending note: Council members and planning commissioners agreed the city still needs a PUD-like tool but want it reformed so the process is legislative (an overlay/master plan) rather than functioning primarily as a conditional use that staff and the planning commission administer. The repeal takes effect as code is amended; pending, vested applications under the old code will be processed under existing rules.
