Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Elections topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents raise questions about ballot-mailing timeline and acceptance in 2024 election

2627183 · February 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Two residents presented statutes and county data to the board, questioning whether ballots were mailed and processed according to state timelines in the 2024 election and asking for further review.

Residents told the Washington County Board of Commissioners on Feb. 4 they reviewed voter-roll data and state statutes and raised questions about the timing and handling of certain ballots during the 2024 general election.

Jill Latray, a Washington County resident, read state election rules and calendar dates during public comment, citing ORS 254.47 and ORS 253.065 and the Secretary of State 2024 election calendar to describe when different categories of ballots may be mailed. Latray said those sources clarify when military, overseas and other out-of-state electors may receive ballots and noted the Secretary of State calendar’s dates for mailing.

Mary Halkiopoulos, who described herself as a 23-year county resident, presented a review of the county voter roll and an “accepted ballots” report. Halkiopoulos said the voter roll shows 2,294 electors requested UOCAVA (military/overseas) or other out-of-state mailings, and that her analysis showed 6,114 ballots were received in a particular period with 6,104 accepted. She asked why those ballots “were accepted and processed before the first logic and accuracy test” and why certain ballots appeared to have been mailed or processed earlier than the timelines she cited.

Halkiopoulos characterized the discrepancies as a potential failure to follow statutes and said she and others will continue to study the records. The transcript captures these concerns and statutory citations as testimony; it does not record board staff responses or any board action in reaction to the claims during the public portion of the meeting.