Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council rejects mayor’s slate for boards and commissions; council and mayor spar over appointment process
Summary
A mayorial slate of appointments to city boards and commissions failed to receive council approval on Feb. 19, prompting a heated exchange about the mayor’s authority to nominate and the council’s role in confirmation. The mayor proposed forming a subcommittee to reach consensus after the vote failed.
The West Sacramento City Council on Feb. 19 did not approve the mayor’s proposed slate of appointments to the city’s boards and commissions, setting off an extended debate over appointment procedure and the mayor’s authority.
Mayor Guerrero said she had solicited recommendations from councilmembers and presented a full set of nominees at Tuesday’s meeting. After the council considered candidates for multiple commissions, a motion to confirm the slate failed on a roll call vote: Councilmember Ocala voted yes; Councilmember Early voted no; Councilmember Orozco voted no; Mayor Pro Tem Sulpizio Hall voted no; and Mayor Guerrero voted yes. With no majority in favor, the nominations did not pass and existing commissioners remain in office until successors are appointed.
The votes produced sharp exchanges on the council dais. Several councilmembers said they had reviewed hundreds of pages of applications and supported nominees who had earned multiple individual council votes; others said the municipal code and state law vest the mayor with the nomination power, subject to council confirmation, and that the mayor’s slate should be afforded deference. City Attorney guidance cited the municipal code and explained that the process for mayoral appointments is to make nominations subject to council approval, and that if the council takes no action within a statutory timeframe some nominations can take effect — but that a majority ‘‘no’’ vote means the proposal fails and the current commissioners retain their positions until replaced.
After the roll call, Mayor Guerrero proposed creating a council subcommittee to work toward a consensus slate; multiple councilmembers agreed to explore a subcommittee approach. The city attorney advised that an ad hoc or subcommittee process could be used to develop a revised list to return to the full council for a vote.
Why it matters: appointments shape advisory boards that advise on planning, parks, housing and other city policies. The disagreement underlines tensions between the mayor’s appointment prerogative and the council’s confirmation authority.
Ending: The council did not adopt replacements; the mayor said she will work with colleagues on a subcommittee to pursue a revised slate for future consideration.
