Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Emery County CRA hears developer pitches, housing‑foundation plan as solar projects promise housing funds

2393207 · January 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Emery County Community Reinvestment Agency members heard on Jan. 14 presentations from a developer, a solar project representative and a proposed Housing Foundation about ways to deploy housing set‑aside dollars generated by renewable energy projects.

Emery County Community Reinvestment Agency members heard on Jan. 14 presentations from a developer, a solar project representative and a proposed Housing Foundation about ways to deploy housing set‑aside dollars generated by recent renewable energy projects.

Teresa Voxey, chief of staff for R Plus Energies, told the CRA the company's Green River Energy Center project will trigger a 20‑year agreement that "we expect to set aside some $8,000,000 in affordable housing set aside," and said her parent company, The Gardner Group, is willing to partner with the county on multifamily and workforce housing development.

Why it matters: Emery County's CRA has begun to receive increment from utility‑scale solar and storage projects; the board must decide how to use housing set‑aside dollars so funds benefit local residents and the county's workforce as large employers expand.

Developer pitch and local site

McCoy, a landowner and developer who identified a 19‑acre parcel near Orangeville, asked the CRA to consider using CRA funds for main infrastructure — sewer, water, roads, curb and gutter — to enable a 44‑lot subdivision he proposes to phase in. McCoy said he holds 42 water shares tied to the property and that "I've had 30, 40 people reaching out looking for building lots, ready to build." He described a phased approach: a roughly 22‑lot phase one with estimated infrastructure costs he described variously from under $1 million for that phase up to $2.2–3 million for broader work, and a central 1.5‑acre lot that he suggested could host a park or recreation facility.

McCoy said some items remain unresolved: annexation into Orangeville City (he cited Utah Code provisions he has reviewed), a proposed sewer alignment that would cross neighboring parcels (he described verbal easement commitments), and the need for additional water shares or other…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans