Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rockville council unanimously reappoints four volunteers and approves consent agenda
Summary
On Feb. 10 the Rockville City Council unanimously reappointed four citizen volunteers to boards and commissions and approved its consent agenda, which included a mowing contract and a state grant agreement.
The Rockville City Council on Feb. 10 unanimously reappointed four residents to city boards and commissions and approved the night’s consent agenda, council members said.
Dr. Miles moved to reappoint Roy Dockman to the Board of Appeals for a full three‑year term through Nov. 1, 2027, which Councilman Valeri seconded; the council approved the motion by voice vote. Councilmember Valeri moved the reappointment of Michael Goldfinger to the Historic District Commission through Feb. 1, 2028; Councilmember Shaw seconded and the motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Jackson moved to reappoint Paula Perez to the Retirement Board through July 1, 2026, seconded by Councilmember Lehi; the council approved it by voice vote. Jackson also moved the reappointment of Ellen Wicker to the Senior Citizens Commission through Feb. 1, 2028; Councillor Shaw seconded and the reappointment was approved unanimously.
The council then approved the consent agenda on a motion by Councilor Beshaw, seconded by Councilmember Van Grack. The items listed on the consent agenda included awarding and authorizing the City Manager to execute a mowing services contract to Lorenz, ratifying the City Manager’s execution of a grant agreement with the State of Maryland to upgrade the City Exposure Management System, and approving minutes. Councilors voted by voice and the motion carried unanimously.
The reappointments restore full terms for volunteers serving on the Board of Appeals, the Historic District Commission, the Retirement Board and the Senior Citizens Commission. The consent items will allow staff to execute the listed contracts and grants without separate roll‑call votes.
Actions recorded at the meeting show the council used voice votes for these routine items; no roll‑call tallies were recorded in the public transcript. Council members moved directly from the consent approvals into the scheduled work session presentations.
