Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Book Challenges Library Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board discusses KECR rule and proposes local book-challenge committee structure; district advisory committee also proposed
Summary
Board members debated a proposed procedural rule (KECR) for handling challenges to instructional materials, discussed a separate district library advisory committee, and directed staff to revise committee makeup before returning in January.
Get email alerts on the Book Challenges Library Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Newberry County Board of Trustees on Dec. 16 discussed a proposed procedural rule (KECR) to handle public challenges to instructional materials and reviewed a separate recommendation to form a district library advisory committee.
Staff described two different bodies: a standing District Library Advisory Committee to support library services, and a smaller local review committee to evaluate individual book challenges that proceed past school-level resolution. The advisory committee was proposed to be large and ongoing, with members including librarians, principals, teachers, parents, a student, a board member, a business partner and a community representative. The book-challenge (review) committee was proposed as a nine-member panel to consider specific challenges originating at a school.
Committee composition and debate
Under the draft, a local review committee would include, for a given school: a librarian from the school, a principal or assistant principal, a teacher, two parents, one School Improvement Council member (elementary/middle) or a student (for high school challenges), and three school board members. Board members debated whether the district lead librarian should sit on the local review committee. Several members recommended removing the district lead librarian from local review committees in order to reduce redundancy and administrative burden and to preserve the advisory group's distinct role.
Board members also debated whether a high school student should serve on a local review committee. Supporters said student voice is important and appropriate maturity and selection can be ensured; others raised concerns about peer pressure and confidentiality. The board did not finalize the makeup at the meeting but directed staff to revise the draft so that the district lead librarian is removed from local review panels and to return the rule in January.
State actions and current compliance
Staff noted the state board already removed several titles and the district notified principals and librarians to ensure those titles were removed from both school libraries and classroom collections when present. The district said it has not required teachers to catalog every classroom book unless a formal request is made; staff will produce procedures to respond to requests for classroom inventories if required.
Next steps
The board asked staff to revise KECR to reflect the board's direction on committee membership and to return the revised rule for further consideration in January. Staff also recommended forming a district library advisory committee (to meet periodically) to support library program planning and to ensure compliance with state library standards.

