Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks Recreation Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council refers golf-course cart-path change order to Park Board after budget questions

2172749 · January 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Councilors voted to send a proposed change order for golf course cart-path work to the Park Board for review after staff said the contract came in under budget and additional priorities had been identified.

The Pryor Creek City Council on Jan. 21 agreed to send a proposed change order for the golf course cart-path project to the Park Board for review after staff said the contractor’s unit bids came in under budget and the project list could be expanded.

City staff and contractors presented a change order that would add items to the original contract based on a priority list provided by golf course management. The proposed change order was described in the meeting materials as adding pavement and related work; the document supplied to council listed a change-order amount of 23,655,699 to be paid to Eric and Son Asphalt Service LLC (amount as presented in meeting packet). Staff said the base bid and unit prices left remaining budget to add higher‑priority items.

Council members asked procedural questions about change-order limits and whether the Park Board had reviewed the specific additions. Staff explained the project was a unit‑price bid (rather than a lump‑sum bid) and that unit‑price contracts have different limits for change-order additions. Staff also emphasized that if unforeseen problems arose in the field (for example, a failing base requiring reconstruction) the city could remove lower‑priority items from the scope to remain within the project allowance.

Because the Park Board had previously approved the overall project budget but had not seen this specific change order list, councilmembers amended the motion to forward the proposed change order to the Park Board for review before the council takes final action. Council approved that referral.

Council and staff said the contractor is scheduled to start the base bid work imminently and that the change‑order work would be prioritized and managed to keep the project within the approved capital allocation. Staff advised the Park Board and city council on steps they would take if additional unforeseen work were required.

Ending: The Park Board will review the proposed change order and advise the council; councilmembers instructed staff to provide measurements and a priority list so board members can evaluate remaining scope and balance remaining capital needs for other park projects.