Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: New Rochelle Planning Board actions, Jan. 28, 2025
Summary
Summary of formal actions taken at the Jan. 28 Planning Board meeting: approvals and referrals including Pratt Landing site plan/subdivision, Glenmore Drive site plan, extension requests for two previously approved projects, and a positive referral on proposed pedestrian plaza code amendments.
This is a concise roundup of formal votes recorded by the City of New Rochelle Planning Board on Jan. 28, 2025.
• PB‑33‑2024 (Pratt Landing Partners LLC, Main Street/waterfront): The board declared lead agency, issued a SEQR negative declaration, and approved subdivision and site plan applications subject to 72 conditions (staff presentation recorded conditions and fees). (See full article on PB‑33‑2024.)
• PB‑34‑2024 (John Woodruff, Glenmore Drive): Site plan approved for construction of a new single‑family home on Glenmore Drive, subject to DPW permits, tree protection measures (coordination with Bartlett), sidewalk replacement if defective, and a restriction barring construction deliveries during Webster School drop‑off and pick‑up hours.
• PB‑9‑2024 (BRP 466 Main Street LLC — extension request): The board approved an extension request for a previously approved subdivision at 466 Main Street. The record notes the applicant is actively moving forward with the project.
• Ordinance referral (city council referral on pedestrian plazas): The board voted to positively refer a proposed ordinance creating a new code chapter regulating public pedestrian plazas (initially listing Anderson Plaza, Memorial Plaza and Garden Street Plaza) to the City Council.
• PB‑1‑2024 (Jonathan Villani — daycare at 524 North Avenue — extension request): The board approved an extension request for a previously approved special permit to convert commercial space to a daycare; staff noted the applicant is nearing building‑permit issuance.
How votes were recorded: In each case where the board approved an item the chair called for the motion, a second was recorded and members responded “Aye.” No opposing votes were recorded for the listed approvals.
Ending: These votes will be reflected in project files and are subject to the listed conditions and any further state or local approvals required.
