Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procedures And Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Third reading of ordinance repealing consent-calendar ordinance 214 stalls over mayor's tie-breaking authority; legal opinion requested
Summary
Council attempted to adopt an ordinance repealing Ordinance 214 (consent-calendar procedures) on third reading. A motion and second were recorded, and roll-call votes were taken, but a point of order about whether the mayor may break a tie on ordinance adoption led the council to delay a final determination pending a written legal opinion.
Hayden City Council took up a third and final reading to repeal Ordinance 214, which governs consent-calendar order and procedures, but deferred a conclusive vote after a legal question about the mayor's tie-breaking authority.
At the meeting the mayor read the ordinance title required for a third reading and called for a motion. A council member moved to adopt the repeal of Ordinance 214 and the motion was seconded. During roll call, council members cast votes (several recorded as yes or no in the transcript), but Mayor Davis and other council members raised a point of order after the roll call: under Idaho law a majority of the council is required to adopt an ordinance, and it was unclear whether the mayor could break a tie on the adoption of an ordinance.
City legal counsel said the council should document the question and that a written legal opinion would be provided at the next meeting. As a result, the votes recorded at the meeting were held "pending" legal analysis and the council did not finalize adoption of the ordinance at this session.
Why it matters: Repealing Ordinance 214 would change the city's formal rules on consent-calendar procedures. The procedural dispute also highlights the council's need to follow statutory requirements for ordinance adoption and to clarify voting procedures for ordinance passage.
