Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use And Floodplain topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Polk County commissioners raise floodplain, insurance and development concerns during reports
Summary
Commissioners reported constituent difficulties selling properties affected by floodplain maps, discussed proposed map updates and urged state/FEMA review; staff said the county would resume conversations with DNR and FEMA to seek resolution.
During commissioner reports at the Jan. 7 Polk County Board meeting, multiple commissioners described constituent problems tied to floodplain mapping, flood insurance requirements and resulting limits on property sales and development.
A commissioner described two recent cases of elderly property owners who cannot sell because lenders require flood insurance, estimating that roughly 30% of that commissioner's district lies in the floodplain and that the insurance cost for one property was about $6,000 a year. The commissioner said county staff are restarting discussions with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) staff about revised flood maps and expressed hope the new maps would address specific cases where properties are only a few inches below regulatory elevations.
Commissioners noted that revised floodplain maps can both help and hurt different parcels: some properties would be removed from the high-risk zone while others could be added. One commissioner said the most recent mapping process began after the 1997 flood and suggested delays in final approvals left several property owners in limbo. County engineering staff (referenced in the meeting) told the board the revised maps had been approved by several neighboring jurisdictions and that the county's role now involves following up with DNR and FEMA to finalize the process.
Commissioners described direct economic impacts: higher site-elevation costs for new structures (examples cited: increased fill, concrete and pad preparation), increased insurance and challenges obtaining building permits or reconstruction approvals in mapped zones. One example given: adding two feet of concrete and hauling hundreds of cubic yards of fill to raise a grain-bin pad, with an implied extra cost in construction. Commissioners also raised related insurance issues, including how replacement-cost coverage may not reimburse site-elevation work.
Why it matters: Floodplain designations influence whether lenders require flood insurance, affect property sales and taxes, and can restrict development or rebuilding on private property. Commissioners said they will continue to press state and federal agencies to complete and approve revised mapping or otherwise identify remedies for affected landowners.
Ending: County staff indicated they would update the board when DNR or FEMA actions occur; commissioners said they would bring constituent cases forward for follow-up at future meetings.
