Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board sends three zoning matters back for further review; Greenfield, Hiddenwood and Belmont Cove to return for action

3789417 · June 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Loudoun County Board advanced three major land‑use applications for additional review on June 11: Greenfield Farm and Hiddenwood Assemblage were sent to the July 15 business meeting for final action, and Belmont Cove was forwarded to the July Transportation & Land Use Committee for further refinement.

The Loudoun County Board of Supervisors on June 11 advanced several major land‑use applications for additional review rather than approving them at the public hearing.

Greenfield Farm (ZMAP/rezoning): County staff told the board that the 174‑acre Greenfield Farm assemblage in the Transition Policy Area proposes a clustered residential and commercial neighborhood — roughly 518 units across multiple lot widths plus a small commercial village — and includes requests for credits against regional road contributions for planned improvements to Evergreen Mills Road and Cross Trail Boulevard. Staff flagged outstanding issues related to heritage resources, fiscal/credit calculations, and the proximity of development to an adjacent historic manor house that the Virginia Department of Historic Resources has identified as significant. The applicant proffered protections including buffers and a potential phase‑3 cultural resources study and has committed to a $100,000 contribution to the housing trust fund; staff recommended additional commitments and further detail before approval. The board voted to forward the Greenfield Farm application to the July 15 business meeting for action, giving supervisors and staff more time to resolve outstanding heritage and capital‑credit questions.

Hiddenwood Assemblage (ZMAP/rezoning): The applicant revised a previous data‑center proposal and resubmitted a non‑data‑center industrial/warehouse plan capped at 335,000 square feet; staff said the current design still raises compatibility concerns because the suburban neighborhood place type anticipates primarily single‑family housing and limited non‑residential uses. Residents and applicants both addressed the board: Hiddenwood Lane neighbors described long‑running construction impacts, aircraft noise and a desire to end a protracted uncertainty about the site; the applicant presented revised building profiles, additional buffers, lower building heights and proffers that prohibit data centers and restrict loading hours. The board voted to forward the Hiddenwood Assemblage application to the July 15 business meeting for action so staff and the applicant can address remaining compatibility and resource issues.

Belmont Cove (ZMAP and associated ZCPA/ZMOD requests): The applicant seeks to rezone an 8.19‑acre parcel in the Belmont area from PD‑OP (planned development‑office park) to R‑16 ADU (residential) for 78 townhome units and to amend setbacks and landscape commitments. Staff identified outstanding issues such as unit size commitments, sidewalk connectivity and public/civic space, and recommended further refinement. The applicant said it will resubmit design and unit‑size commitments and requested the item be sent to the July Transportation & Land Use Committee (TLUC) meeting; the board agreed and forwarded the item for TLUC consideration.

Why it matters: Each application touches major county policy questions: where and how to add housing (and what types), how and whether to credit developer‑funded road improvements against capital or regional contributions, and how to identify, protect and integrate cultural and historic resources into new development. Greenfield Farm raised the most substantial heritage‑resource flags (the historic Greenfield manor house and three archaeological loci that may be associated with earlier tenant or enslaved populations). Hiddenwood’s item involved intense neighborhood stress from years of adjacent construction and the question of whether a long‑running land‑use dispute can be resolved by moving away from a data‑center proposal.

Public comment and staff concerns: Speakers on Greenfield urged stronger, specific protections for the manor house and an explicit plan for the archaeological loci; county staff asked the applicant for clearer transportation credit calculations and more specificity about the community and civic space. On Hiddenwood, several homeowners described constant construction traffic, aircraft noise and the strain of a multi‑year process and urged a solution. Belmont Cove drew discussion about unit sizes and sidewalk connections; staff asked the applicant to commit to square‑footage limits and to provide sidewalk access for all units.

Next steps: The board’s forwarding motions put three large applications on a short timeline for additional review and possible final action at July meetings: Greenfield Farm and Hiddenwood Assemblage to the July 15 business meeting; Belmont Cove to the July TLUC meeting. Staff and applicants will negotiate the outstanding issues identified in presentations, including heritage‑resource protections at Greenfield, improved proffers and unit‑size commitments at Belmont Cove, and the exact mitigation and design commitments for Hiddenwood.

Speakers and presenters (attribution whitelist) Allison Britton — Department of Planning & Zoning, Loudoun County (Greenfield and Hiddenwood staff presentation); Darby MacCath — Department of Planning & Zoning (Belmont Cove presenter); Roy Barnett — applicant representative (Belmont Cove); Denise Harover — applicant representative (Greenfield); Scott Bell — Hiddenwood resident (public comment); Jackie Clement — community speaker/teacher (public comment on Hiddenwood); Emily Johnson — Piedmont Environmental Council (public comment on heritage resources).

Authorities and special issues: The applicant and staff discussed credits against capital facilities and regional roads contributions for off‑site improvements; staff said the proposed cross‑trail and Evergreen Mills improvements are not currently on the county CIP and therefore do not meet staff’s standard for credit against capital facilities but may be eligible for credit against regional roads under board policy. Staff also noted an identified bald eagle nest near Greenfield and asked for the applicant’s 660‑foot buffer commitment for that feature.

Provenance: Planning staff presentations and the June 11 public hearing record.

Proper names referenced: Greenfield Farm; Greenfield Manor House; Belmont Cove; Stone Tower Winery; Piedmont Environmental Council; Shreve Mill Road; Evergreen Mills Road; Cross Trail Boulevard.

Implementation risk: High for Greenfield until heritage and credit issues are resolved; medium for Hiddenwood while the applicant and neighbors finalize proffers and buffering; low‑to‑medium for Belmont Cove pending unit‑size and sidewalk commitments.

Searchable tags: Greenfield Farm, Hiddenwood Assemblage, Belmont Cove, rezoning, historic resources, transportation credits, sidewalks, ADU.