Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bluff commissioners probe unpermitted work, ask town attorney for enforcement guidance
Summary
Commission members flagged several cases of possible unpermitted development, including a property owner reportedly proceeding without site plans and a gas-station remodel with no county building permit; they asked the town attorney for recommended enforcement processes and whether retroactive clearances should be allowed.
At their Jan. 2 meeting, the Town of Bluff Planning and Zoning Commission discussed several enforcement concerns involving work that may be occurring without required land-use clearance or building permits and agreed to ask the town attorney for guidance on process and consequences.
Commissioners said they had received reports that a local property owner, identified in the discussion as Galen, is conducting commercial development without a site plan, building permit or land-use clearance, and that Galen has told people he does not intend to obtain the permits. Commission staff said Erin will contact Galen and then update the commission.
Commissioners also raised the turquoise gas station remodel as a case on their radar. Chair Amanda Podmore said she verified on Dec. 23 that county records did not show an active building permit for the interior remodel. Podmore said she has been in contact with project oversight manager Sandy Mayard and will connect Mayard directly with the county after the builder, Sam Wheldon, told Mayard he had paperwork that the county did not show. “I have been in contact with the project oversight manager, Sandy Mayard, and I’m going to connect her directly with the county,” Podmore said.
Members discussed retroactive land-use clearances and noted the commission has occasionally issued land-use clearances after work began. Commissioners asked the attorney whether the town should treat deliberate noncompliance differently than genuine mistakes, and whether there should be a standard process for retroactive permits, including graduated consequences that match the severity of the violation.
Commissioners also proposed reaching out to neighboring municipalities to learn best practices for enforcement and for procedures to follow when permits are missing. The commission asked staff to prepare a short memo summarizing reported incidents, suggested questions for the town attorney, and sample enforcement processes the commission could consider at a future work session.
Ending: The commission will send the compiled questions and incident summaries to the town attorney, and will continue the discussion at a work session that may include the attorney or other municipal staff for comparative practice advice.
