Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Preliminary Plat topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board pauses review of KWH Investments preliminary plat, cites infrastructure and subdivision standards
Summary
The board recessed the public hearing on a 12-lot preliminary plat by KWH Investments that lies outside city limits but within Valley Center's jurisdictional area; staff and the city engineer said the draft plat does not meet city subdivision standards for street access, water and sewer, and recommended denial unless revised.
The Valley Center Planning and Zoning Board recessed the public hearing on a 12-lot preliminary plat submitted by KWH Investments for land southeast of Interurban Drive and West 90 Third Street North in Sedgwick County, scheduling continued consideration for Feb. 25 at 7 p.m.
City staff and the city's engineering consultant told the board the draft plat does not meet Valley Center's subdivision regulations. Kyle (staff member) said the development sits adjacent to city limits and existing city water and sewer infrastructure; the city's engineering review concluded the proposal as drafted lacked required direct public-road access for several interior lots and did not show feasible connections to public water and sewer. The city engineer's statement read in the hearing noted multiple requirements for "urban-type" subdivisions — including direct driveway access to public streets, and connection to public water and sewer where feasible — that the preliminary plat did not depict.
Applicant representatives said they initially designed the subdivision to county standards after earlier communications led them to believe the land fell under Sedgwick County jurisdiction. Dan Garber, agent for KWH Investments, told the board the developer submitted the plat to the county using county rules, including shared driveways and larger lots appropriate for county review. He said the property owner purchased the land after receiving guidance that the land was in the county's area of influence and that the landowner proceeded in good faith. "We designed it to county specs with shared, joint access easements," Garber said. He asked the board to consider approval to county standards because the roads are maintained by the township and because several lots rely on shared access under county practice.
Board members and staff discussed options to make the plat comply with Valley Center's regulations. Staff suggested possible revisions: reconfiguring access easements into a platted road to provide direct public access to lots currently served only by private easements; evaluating the feasibility and cost distribution for a sewer lift station if public sewer service were to be extended; and working with the applicant on water and road improvements. Staff offered to work with the applicant on revisions but advised that substantial changes could require renewed public notice.
The board voted to recess and continue the public hearing to Feb. 25 at 7 p.m. so the applicant and staff could pursue revisions. The hearing was recessed rather than denied; the board left open the possibility of returning with a plat revised to meet subdivision standards or with additional documentation on infrastructure feasibility.
Why it matters: The parcel sits adjacent to existing city infrastructure and planned growth areas; approving a plat that does not conform to city standards could create an outlying development that is difficult to service and to integrate into future city roads and utilities.
What happens next: The applicant and staff will work on revisions; a continued public hearing is scheduled for Feb. 25, when the board will consider whether the revised plat satisfies the city's subdivision regulations.
