Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Criminal Court Docket topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Monroe County court hears pleas, denies shock probation, revokes probation and orders treatment

2627338 · February 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a session of Monroe County District Court, the judge denied at least one motion for shock probation, revoked probation in a burglary-related matter, accepted multiple guilty pleas including several drug and vehicular cases, and ordered treatment sanctions and sentencing dates for several defendants.

A session of Monroe County District Court included a series of plea entries, sentence recommendations and contested probation matters. The judge denied at least one request for shock probation, revoked probation in a burglary-related case, accepted multiple guilty pleas on drug and violent charges, and scheduled several cases for sentencing or follow-up hearings.

The court declined a request for shock probation from defendant Emmanuel Howard after the Commonwealth pointed to his prior trafficking convictions and argued he had received a “break” in an earlier case. The judge said he would deny the motion and allow Howard to pursue parole review at a later date. In a separate matter, the court revoked the probation of Terry Jackson after testimony from Scottsville Police Officer David Clark that Jackson had admitted entering a neighbor’s home and removing items; the judge found the burglary and resulting felony charges sufficient to revoke and ordered Jackson held pending those charges.

The court accepted numerous negotiated pleas and set sentencing or follow-up hearings. Notable plea-related outcomes recorded on the docket include: - Steven Chavez: The Commonwealth announced a recommendation calling for concurrent terms that would result in an 11-year sentence for vehicular homicide; the Commonwealth opposed probation and shock probation; the court accepted the plea and ordered a presentence investigation and sentencing hearing. - Diego Morales: Entered guilty pleas in a fentanyl/methamphetamine matter under a negotiated package the Commonwealth described as a total of three years (1 year for methamphetamine and 2 years for fentanyl), with an initial jail term (90 days) and the balance probated under supervised probation; the court accepted the plea pending a presentence investigation and set a sentencing date. - Multiple defendants (including several charged with possession or trafficking of methamphetamine and other controlled substances) were placed on negotiated dispositions that included probation, probation with entry into the Monroe specialty/drug court, or pretrial diversion, with numerous cases scheduled for follow-up on the court’s March docket.

The court also handled a mix of administrative and procedural matters: the grand jury returned indictments and was excused after completing its work; the court took one matter under submission (a request for shock probation by James Bowe) and indicated it would revisit that request after the defendant’s parole review timeline; and the court scheduled competency and civil commitment-related hearings where statutory procedures were raised.

Several defendants were directed to engage with probation and parole or specialty-treatment providers as conditions of negotiated pleas or continued release. In at least one probation-revocation case the judge ordered that custody time already served be counted as a sanction and directed coordination with treatment providers to place the defendant in a longer-term rehabilitation program when one became available.

Many matters on the docket were continued to negotiation or sentencing dates later in the month; where the transcript did not record a specific outcome the court scheduled presentence investigation reports or set next appearances. The court’s actions affect custody status, supervised release conditions and referrals to treatment or the parole board for multiple people charged in Monroe County.