Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tulsa County treasurer outlines legal limits on property tax payment plans; invites local lawmakers to refine bill
Summary
Tulsa County Treasurer John described statutory and operational hurdles to adopting flexible county-run property tax payment plans, discussed House Bill 2003 (2023), and offered to work with local legislators on revised language to address partial-payment accounting, interest handling and software implementation.
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tulsa County Treasurer John (last name not specified) briefed the Public Works Committee on the legal and operational constraints that affected recent attempts to create county-managed property tax payment plans.
John told the committee the treasurer’s office has steered residents with delinquent taxes toward local programs that have helped prevent sales, but statutory rules limit what treasurers may do. He said, “I shall sell those delinquent properties that are more than 3 years delinquent, on the second Monday in June,” describing the mandatory sale schedule the office follows. He explained that uncertainty about the final tax bill (certified in October) and how to treat partial prepayments were central problems with prior legislation.
John reviewed House Bill 2003 (2023), saying it passed the Oklahoma House but did not reach a senate floor vote in his view; he described multiple sticking points in the bill’s draft, including how to apply partial payments and whether interest income on held funds would be retained by treasurers. He said the State Treasurers Association largely opposed the bill in its then-current form. John invited local council members and potential authors to work with him over the summer to craft a bill that addresses accounting, software integration, and protections for taxpayers. Council members asked about precedents in other states, thresholds to limit the bill to larger counties, and whether interest earnings could be used to support people who fall behind on payments.
No formal legislation was adopted at the meeting; staff and council members agreed to continue discussions with the treasurer and potential legislative authors.
