Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Special Events Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lake Elsinore council adopts special-events procedures 3-2 after debate over public-safety costs and community access

3551503 ยท May 27, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City Council approved a new special-events procedures document (Item 14) 3-2 after councilmembers debated whether the rules would deter neighborhood organizers and how public-safety costs are allocated. The council also approved the remainder of its consent calendar and successor-agency items.

The City of Lake Elsinore City Council on Monday approved a special-events procedures document (Item 14) by a 3-2 vote after councilmembers debated whether the new rules would chill neighborhood-organized events and how public-safety costs should be allocated.

The vote came during consideration of the consent calendar. Councilmembers approved items 2 through 21, excluding item 14, by motion (moved by Councilwoman Johnson, seconded by Councilmember Manos; vote tally not specified in the public record). Item 14 was then considered separately and passed 3-2 (moved by Councilwoman Johnson; seconded by Mayor Pro Tem McGee).

The special-events procedures lay out steps and requirements event organizers must follow; supporters said the document provides clarity, fiscal safeguards and public-safety planning, while opponents warned it could deter small, neighborhood events.

Councilmember Sheridan characterized the procedures as potentially burdensome for new residents or small organizers. "I don't wanna dissuade people who move into our area and wanna do events in the area, from doing so because they look at the procedure and say, wow, that's a lot," Sheridan said, and added he would vote no.

Councilwoman Johnson, who pressed to bring the item back to the dais sooner, defended the procedures as a foundation for consistent event permitting. "I pushed to have it brought back at this meeting because I know ... there are people and or events that are right now we will be seeing by the end of the year and I wanted to make sure there was a foundation and a plan and stability for those that did want to, have events," Johnson said. She said the policy addresses fiscal responsibility, public-safety planning and transparency and "helps everyone have a safe place to land."

Councilmember Manos said he shared some of Sheridan's concerns about how estimates for crowd size and public-safety staffing are determined. Manos said the policy "seems to put any of the onus with the city" and at one point withdrew his second on the motion, saying he wanted to see how forthcoming ordinance rewrites read before committing to the procedures.

Mayor Pro Tem McGee acknowledged longstanding tension over perceived overstaffing at some events and noted a council subcommittee serves as a backstop when applicants and staff cannot agree on public-safety needs. McGee cited the Elsinore Grand Prix and a local parade as examples and said the council can also sponsor or subsidize some nonprofit events.

Several councilmembers noted the city attorney is preparing revisions to two ordinances referenced in staff reports โ€” a special-events ordinance and a parade ordinance โ€” and said those rewrites could affect future procedures. Councilmember Sheridan had earlier requested the rewrite and said the revised draft was an improvement, though not sufficient to earn his support.

In separate action, the council's successor agency approved items 22 through 28 by a 5-0 vote (motion by Agency member Manos; second by Agency member Johnson). The clerk announced there were no requests to speak on those successor-agency items.

No timeline for final ordinance changes was provided during the meeting, and the transcript does not record a detailed breakdown of which councilmembers voted yes or no on item 14 beyond the 3-2 outcome.

The meeting record shows public-comment rules were recited at the start of the meeting under Government Code section 54954.3; no substantive public comments related to Item 14 were offered during the single-minute non-agenda public comment period.