Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Board hears update on book-review process, legal limits and timeline for formal objections
Summary
Board members asked why a checklist “yes” on potentially pornographic content does not automatically remove a book; district staff and counsel said state law and administrative rules require a multi-step review and formal objections trigger a committee process, with two titles retained so far and several removed or pulled pending review.
Board members pressed district staff on Monday for clearer rules and faster outcomes in the district’s book-review process after a recent wave of formal objections and a federal lawsuit involving 12 titles.
Dr. Burns and Dr. Carrie Burgess Watkins reviewed the district’s existing process, which follows state statutes and Florida Department of Education training guidance. Staff said the district provides committee members with a state-provided evaluation form that includes a checklist item asking whether material is pornographic or “harmful to minors.” Staff explained that committee members mark that checklist while they review a title, but the checklist item by itself is not a final removal vote.
Brett Steger,…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
