Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Transit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supporters of HF14 urge moratorium on Blue Line light rail, push for bus rapid transit
Summary
At a public forum hosted by Rep. Kristen Robbins, residents, business owners and transit experts urged support for House File 14, a proposal to pause spending on the Blue Line Extension and consider bus rapid transit (BRT) instead. Speakers cited business displacement, construction disruption and cost overruns on past projects.
Get email alerts on the Public Transit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Kristen Robbins, who represents District 37A, introduced supporters of House File 14 (HF14) and said the bill "would put a moratorium on the blue line light rail until the Southwest light rail is done." Robbins said constituents along the Blue Line corridor asked for a pause so communities could push for bus rapid transit instead.
At the event, residents and business owners from Robbinsdale, North Minneapolis, Crystal and Jordan described what they said would be harmful impacts from light-rail construction. "I fully urge our state representatives to vote yes on HF14 which will pause construction on the blue line extension," said Eric Hillman, who identified himself as a Robbinsville resident and representative of StopLight Rail 81.
Speakers described three recurring concerns: displacement or closure of long-standing local businesses during prolonged construction, project cost overruns and the potential for increased crime or public-safety burdens near stations. Mark Wellna, who identified himself as the third-generation owner of Wellnaes Hardware, said his downtown Robbinsdale store operates on "very thin margins" and that prolonged construction could push customers elsewhere.
Several presenters pointed to past projects for context. Dean Rose, who described himself as a third-generation property and business owner on West Broadway, cited a 2015 Hennepin County environmental impact study and said the report "determined ... West Broadway was not a viable option for light rail transit due to its narrow and curvy configuration." Rose also cited what he said were post-construction effects on University Avenue: "Ridership is down 30%, street traffic is down 50%, and empty storefronts litter University Avenue," he said.
Speakers offered BRT as a lower-cost, faster alternative. Transportation consultant Tim David said BRT could be delivered for about $280,000,000 compared with a $3,200,000,000 estimate for LRT on the corridor, and argued that BRT can provide similar travel times while avoiding long track construction. "Bus rapid transit can be implemented for a tenth of the cost of LRT in this corridor," David said.
Other presenters highlighted local impacts they said have not been adequately addressed by project planners. Crystal Porter, executive director of the West Broadway Business and Area Coalition and a North Minneapolis resident, raised concerns about children crossing busy streets near proposed alignments and said existing anti-displacement funds lack guarantees: "We do not have any safeguards or real promises made about anti displacement," she said, adding that she was "not trustful" that the Metropolitan Council would be accountable to neighborhood residents.
Adway Pugh, executive director of the Jordan Area Community Council, said the corridor could displace many homes: "In the Jordan neighborhood ... the light rail is going to take out approximately 630 lots from Jordan and Hawthorne," he said, and added that neighborhood officials had seen local crime rates decline in recent years.
Speakers and organizers urged lawmakers to pause new LRT spending until recent projects are completed and evaluated. Robbins said she had discussed the issue with colleagues and that many are "interested in the conversation because they realize, that bus rapid transit is much more affordable and, doesn't do the disruption." Asked about federal funding prospects for the Blue Line Extension, she said she estimated them as "very low." Chair Kosnick was mentioned as preparing related outreach.
No formal vote or committee action on HF14 is recorded in the forum transcript. The event was a public hearing-style presentation of constituent views, testimony and expert commentary aimed at influencing legislators considering HF14.
Ending: Supporters asked legislators to delay new LRT spending and to consider BRT as an alternative that they say would limit construction disruption and lower costs. Representative Robbins said she would continue discussions with colleagues and pursue outreach on funding and committee positions.

