Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Technology Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
College Station ISD board reviews cell phone survey; staff and trustees differ on next steps
Summary
District staff presented results of a December survey on student cell phone use; while parents and students were split, many staff reported frequent nonacademic phone use and nearly half of staff respondents favored stricter restrictions. Trustees asked for campus-level follow-up and emphasized campus-driven approaches over districtwide mandates.
College Station ISD staff presented the results of a December survey on student cell phone use and summarized feedback gathered from parents, students, teachers and advisory groups. The presentation explained the district’s current bring-your-own-device policy, noted the 2018 SHAC recommendation to limit use to approved instructional purposes, and described a recent survey completed by roughly 4,400 respondents.
Presenters reported that responses varied by stakeholder group: parents tended to say phones should be used rarely or only for academics; staff reported observing frequent nonacademic phone use; and student responses (notably concentrated at one intermediate campus) suggested many students do not regularly use phones at school. Staff comments and open-ended responses flagged distraction, cyberbullying, social-media-driven drama and mental-health concerns as commonly reported problems. Some respondents also noted the instructional benefits of phones for accessing Schoology and project collaboration at the high school level.
Trustees discussed enforcement inconsistencies across campuses and recommended deeper campus-level surveys and conversations—particularly at high schools—before pursuing district policy changes. Several trustees supported campus-led protocols so principals and administration could adopt practices that matched local needs; one trustee urged the board not to let the issue “die” and recommended closer engagement with campus staff. Another trustee noted pending state legislation that could affect local options and said the board should watch developments before adopting districtwide rules.
No policy change was proposed or approved at the meeting. District staff said the next step would be further campus-level investigation and continued discussion with DEIC, teacher advisory council and campus leadership.
