Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Funding And Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Advisory board reviews past ARPA uses, pavilion and sign requests; asks staff for clearer application process
Summary
Members reviewed prior spending from ARPA and impact fees (including a swing set purchase), discussed a planned porta‑potty and pavilion maintenance, and agreed to ask town staff for the formal process to request impact‑fee money for parks projects and for updates on historical park signage.
The Hooksett Parks and Recreation Advisory Board spent part of its Feb. 1 meeting reviewing how parks projects have been funded in recent years and identifying next steps for future requests.
Members said the town previously used ARPA funds for a number of local projects and that a swing set purchased for a park was paid from leftover ARPA money. The board also discussed a pavilion project that had previously been authorized and said the porta‑potty contract for the pavilion space was budgeted at about $200 per month for summer months.
Board members discussed the history of earlier funding efforts, including previous attempts to sell memorial pavers that were stalled because vendor software could not interface with town financial systems. They said smaller purchases over recent years had typically been for minor equipment and supplies and financed either by impact fees, town council allocations or one‑time grants.
Members requested clarity about the formal process for requesting an allocation from impact‑fee balances, including whether an advisory‑board application is required, what criteria must be shown (demonstrating growth-related capital need), and whether funds collected in one area of town can be spent in another. The board agreed to ask town staff—Christine and Geraldine were named as contacts—to provide a written explanation and copies of any application materials.
The board also raised an outstanding request for historical signage at Lambeth’s Park (Fred Lambert memorial signs). Members said a councilor had told them funds existed and that signs had been drafted, but the board had not received follow-up. They asked the chair to re-raise the item with the town council if no staff response arrives.
Finally, members discussed small recreational projects—such as resurfacing a walkway at Lemus Park and restoring an ice rink—and noted that some items might be feasible with modest impact‑fee or town allocations but that larger items (fields or artificial turf) would require substantial capital and separate approvals.
