Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Impact Fees Tif Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board learns $119,000 in recreation impact fees tied to Peterbook lighting; water department weighing new wells for West Side development
Summary
The Hooksett Parks and Recreation Advisory Board on Feb. 1 was briefed on roughly $119,000 in recreation impact fees earmarked for a lighting project referenced in the meeting as “Peterbook,” and on water‑department plans to test wells to support anticipated development in a proposed TIF district.
Board members discussed the town’s available impact fees, a TIF district and related infrastructure needs for anticipated West Side development during their Feb. 1 meeting.
Board members said a recreational impact‑fee account contains about $119,000; town staff at the council meeting had described that sum as earmarked toward a roughly $400,000 lighting project at a site referenced in the meeting as “Peterbook.” Members said the $119,000 would be only a portion of the lighting cost and that the lighting project would require additional funding to reach the $400,000 target.
Members also discussed a separate tax-increment financing (TIF) planning meeting and said two people from the town water department attended to explain water-supply implications for new development. According to the board’s summary of that discussion, water staff said the town may need to identify and test new well sites if the TIF district brings substantial growth; staff described ongoing outreach to landowners to secure potential well locations and said the town will test for suitable groundwater near the river.
Board members raised questions about whether certain incoming businesses would pay impact fees. They discussed Harley‑Davidson and Old Dominion Freight Line in the context of West-Side development; members said some work is an expansion of existing buildings and that impact‑fee obligations depend on whether construction is new development or renovation of existing structures. The board heard that Old Dominion planned an expanded footprint that may partly sit in neighboring communities and that the water department needs at least an estimate of how much additional water the planned projects would consume.
Members sought clarity on how and where impact fees may be spent, including whether fees collected in one area can be applied to projects in another area. The board was told impact fees must generally be used for growth-related capital needs and that some fees may revert to developers if not spent within a statutory or policy window; the board agreed to request a staff briefing on the rules governing how impact fees are collected and allocated.
The board noted that ARPA funds and other prior allocations have funded parks projects in past years, but that impact‑fee balances and earmarks can be specific to departments or projects. The board requested follow-up from town staff to: confirm the $119,000 figure; identify any legal or timing restrictions on using those funds; and explain the process for requesting impact‑fee allocations for parks projects.
