Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing 301 Cypress topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council backs letter of support for 301 Cypress affordable-mixed housing tax-credit application
Summary
The council approved a resolution of support so developer Overland Property Group can pursue Low-Income Housing Tax Credits for an adaptive-reuse apartment project at 301 Cypress, prompting debate over 35-year affordability commitments and ground-floor commercial space.
The Abilene City Council voted to approve a resolution of support for a proposed adaptive-reuse housing project at 301 Cypress Street, enabling the developer to pursue competitive Low-Income Housing Tax Credits and other multifamily financing.
Project summary: Overland Property Group seeks to convert the existing historic structure at 301 Cypress into a roughly 49-unit apartment community. Developer April Engstrom said the plan would reserve 37 of the 49 units for households at or averaging 60% of area median income, with roughly 25% of units remaining market-rate. Engstrom said the affordability restrictions would be in place for about 35 years.
Why it matters: council support is typically required for competitive applications to the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs for the Section 42 Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program. Staff and the developer said the building is zoned for multifamily by right; the resolution of support does not change zoning but strengthens the project’s competitiveness for scarce tax credits.
Public comment and concerns: Several downtown stakeholders and business groups voiced conditional support; the Abilene Chamber and Regional Growth Alliance expressed support, and the Abilene Downtown Association said it shifted to support after receiving more project details. Some business owners and council members raised concerns that locking affordability levels for 35 years is a long-term commitment and urged careful consideration of ground-floor commercial uses to serve downtown needs. Councilman Craver said he remained concerned about locking affordability commitments in the context of recent large public investments on Cypress Street and wanted more time to see market response after streetscape improvements.
Staff clarification: Van Watson, assistant director of planning and development, said the project is permitted by current zoning and that the resolution is an endorsement to help secure state tax credits; it does not obligate the city to provide funding or zoning changes.
Vote: The council approved the resolution with one dissenting vote (Councilman Reagan recorded as a no). The measure passed under a motion to reconsider the item after it had been denied previously.
Next steps: The developer will pursue the state tax-credit application and other financing steps; city staff will continue to coordinate on public benefits such as potential commercial space and parking needs raised by downtown stakeholders.
