Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission tables telecom franchise item to clarify permit/fee language
Summary
InfoWest asked whether county encroachment and permit fees would apply to a proposed franchise; commissioners asked staff to confirm fee treatment and state‑law limits, and they tabled the franchise item to the next meeting for clarity.
A telecommunications franchise agreement the commission had scheduled for consideration was tabled after company representatives asked whether typical county encroachment and permitting fees would apply under a proposed franchise. Brandon from InfoWest told the commission that the firm pays permit fees in other jurisdictions and asked whether the county’s franchise language would exempt or require those fees.
County staff said the county has standard encroachment and permit fees and that the draft franchise does not exempt franchise holders from paying development and encroachment fees when the company performs physical work in county right‑of‑way; staff also said they would re‑check state statutory language about franchise fees and historical limits on newly created franchise fees. The commission agreed to table the item and directed staff to return with a clarified franchise draft for the next meeting.
Why it matters: franchises can set conditions for rights‑of‑way use and sometimes include fee provisions; the county said it wants consistent treatment across permit processes while ensuring any franchise language complies with state law.
Ending: staff will revise the franchise language and return at the next meeting with a recommendation and clarified fee language.
