Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Nassau County magistrate fines Yulee property owners $100 plus $405.16 in administrative costs after short noncompliance
Summary
A Nassau County special magistrate found Todd and Candace Saladinin violation of county nuisance and serviceable-vehicle ordinances, assessed $100 for two days of post-deadline noncompliance and $405.16 in administrative costs, and said a written order will be entered.
On Feb. 10, 2025, a Nassau County special magistrate found that property owned by Todd and Candace Saladin at 85444 Wilson Neck Road in Yulee had been in violation of Nassau County code and imposed a $100 fine for two days of noncompliance plus $405.16 in administrative costs.
The magistrate's determination followed testimony by Nassau County Code Enforcement Officer Travis Taylor, who told the hearing that the property had previously been found in violation on Jan. 14, 2025, and that the owner was ordered to bring the property into compliance by Feb. 7, 2025. Taylor said the county posted the order on the property on Jan. 17 and that "as of 02/10/2025, the property has achieved compliance with Nassau County code ordinance section 18 and a quarter dash 4 and section 18 and a quarter dash 5 subsection 3."
The magistrate cited those dates when calculating the penalty. "Therefore, the previously imposed daily fine of $50, for 2 days, total fine of a hundred dollars will be imposed, as well as the assessment of the administrative cost in the amount of $405.16," the magistrate said. The magistrate also said a written order reflecting that pronouncement would be entered in the coming days.
Officer Taylor told the magistrate that the county was seeking a $100 fine representing two days of post-deadline noncompliance and $405.16 in administrative costs. The magistrate noted the neighborhood had multiple related cases and that at least one complaint had prompted enforcement action.
There were no respondents presenting testimony at the hearing and no public comments on other agenda items. The special magistrate set the next hearing date for March 11, 2025.
The proceeding was recorded and the magistrate reiterated standard quasi-judicial procedures at the outset: evidence must address the alleged violation, repetitive or irrelevant testimony would be excluded, and documents or photos submitted would become part of the record and not be returned.
