Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Police Response topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents tell Jamestown council police response falls short after repeated neighborhood threats
Summary
During public comments at the Dec. 30 Jamestown City Council meeting, two residents described repeated threats and nuisance behavior from a neighbor and said police responses have been limited to warnings; they urged local action and training changes tied to state bail and discovery reforms.
Two Jamestown residents urged the City Council on Dec. 30 to address what they described as repeated threats, nuisance behavior and inadequate police responses in their neighborhood.
"There's been some improvements in my neighborhood. I live with an autistic child who has developed a tic because of a recent neighbor who is an alcoholic," said a resident who identified himself as Larry and gave his address as 215 Fulton Street. He said the neighbor has made threats, threatened pets and created a persistent disturbance that police calls have not resolved.
Another resident identified as Al (transcript: —All—) Wolf of 212 Fulton Street said officers often respond and "go talk to people," which he said has not stopped repeated threats. "Talking's not helping when that happens 3, 4, 5 times," he said, and described difficulties getting arrests despite repeated threats of physical harm. Wolf said the residents believe recent state-level bail and discovery-law changes contribute to the difficulty of securing arrests and expressed a desire for additional training and local remedy.
Both speakers asked the council to consider steps to improve neighborhood safety and police effectiveness; the council allowed the public comment period remarks but did not make or record any immediate policy directives or formal votes in response during the meeting. Council members did not engage in extended discussion during the remainder of the session, and no staff report or action in response to the comments was recorded in the meeting minutes.
The residents' remarks were presented during the public-comment portion of the Dec. 30 meeting; the council's subsequent agenda focused on resolutions and administrative items.
