Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Legislative Process Committee adopts technical house, senate and joint rules changes
Summary
The Legislative Process Committee voted to approve house, senate and joint rules resolutions that make technical changes including drafting method clarifications, committee name updates and policy reference updates.
Get email alerts on the Legislative Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Legislative Process Committee voted unanimously to approve three resolutions updating technical provisions in the House rules, Senate rules and Joint rules. The measures, presented by legislative counsel, make drafting‑system and terminology changes and correct outdated committee names and references.
Megan Bolen of the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel told the committee the resolutions were intended to address “very technical, minor changes” so they could be handled early in the session. Bolen said the most substantive drafting change is a limitation imposed by the legislature’s new drafting system: adding or removing an entire section of legislation or otherwise modifying a section will need to be accomplished by a substitute bill rather than by an amendment. “It’s just going to require a different mechanism to get that done,” Bolen said.
The house rules resolution renames the House Business and Labor Standing Committee to the House Business, Labor and Commerce Standing Committee and incorporates the substitute‑for‑amendment drafting change. The senate rules resolution makes the same drafting change and corrects a numbering error. The joint rules resolution updates references to the legislative management committee’s revised policy (formerly labeled the harassment policy and now titled the discriminatory conduct policy), aligns several committee names (including renaming the Administrative Rules Committee to the Rules Review and General Oversight Committee) and updates other cross‑references.
Committee members asked clarifying questions about how the substitute requirement will operate in committee and on the floor, and Bolen and committee staff described the practical effect: the substantive changes remain possible, but the mechanism for accomplishing them will be a substitute bill rather than an amendment. Members also discussed the editorial name changes and the policy reference update to match legislative management committee terminology and training requirements.
Votes and procedure: the committee first approved the meeting minutes, then took separate motions to approve the senate rules resolution, the house rules resolution and the joint rules resolution; each motion was approved by the committee without recorded opposition. The committee chair directed staff to prepare the implementing bill files for the changes where necessary.
What this means: the changes are primarily procedural and editorial but affect how committees and sponsors will process certain mid‑stream changes to legislation once the legislature’s new drafting system is in use. Committee staff said they do not expect the substitute requirement to materially slow typical committee work because substitutes can be moved quickly when needed, but they cautioned members about the procedural difference.
