Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning staff recommends parking-variance approval for assisted-living project in Ketchikan Gateway Borough
Summary
Planning staff recommended approval of a parking variance for an assisted-living facility, saying parking was calculated at one space per bed and seven spaces would be required; the transcript does not show a final vote.
Get email alerts on the Parking Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning staff recommended approval of a parking variance for an assisted-living facility in Ketchikan Gateway Borough, according to remarks recorded in the meeting transcript. Staff said the project’s parking requirement had been calculated at one space per bed, for a total of seven spaces, and recommended the variance to accommodate that calculation. The transcript does not specify the date of the meeting or a final Council vote.
The recommendation was presented during discussion of a resolution (name not specified in the transcript). A staff speaker described the variance request as aimed at allowing parking within the complex where units are counted by bed rather than by dwelling unit. The transcript records that the applicant’s representatives — identified generically in the record as developer, architect and contractor — participated in the discussion.
Speakers also discussed programmatic classification of the project. One speaker described “permanent supportive housing” as functionally similar to a nursing home for the purposes of the parking calculation and service planning. A separate comment in the transcript referenced a fee described as about $115 per quarter related to a low-end or turn-end calculation for “KIC” (term not defined in the transcript); that fee amount is presented in the record as approximate and the transcript does not supply additional detail or an authoritative source for the fee.
No formal motion text, mover/second, or vote tally appears in the provided transcript excerpts. The only recorded formalized action in the excerpts is staff’s recommendation to approve the variance; whether the Borough assembly adopted that recommendation is not specified in the provided record.
The discussion raised implementation questions that were not resolved in the excerpts: whether the parking calculation based on beds rather than units is final for permitting, any related fee schedule changes, and whether other approvals (such as building or health licensing) are required before occupancy. Those items were discussed but not settled in the provided transcript.
Because the transcript excerpts do not include a final vote or ordinance text, the record in this article limits itself to what was explicitly said: staff recommended approval of a parking variance for an assisted-living/permanent-supportive-housing project, the parking was described as one space per bed with seven spaces required, applicant representatives were present, and an approximate fee of $115 per quarter was mentioned without further detail.
